China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ›› 2024, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (3): 274-278.doi: 10.19438/j.cjoms.2024.03.012

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation of the therapeutic effect of polidocanol foam sclerotherapy in the treatment of head and neck venous malformations under medical and nursing collaboration

ZHANG Fang, SHOU Wei-dong, LI Yan   

  1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Nangjing Stomatological Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Institute of Stomatology, Nanjing University. Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2023-10-23 Revised:2024-01-08 Online:2024-05-20 Published:2024-06-11

Abstract: PURPOSE: To explore the difference in therapeutic effect and injection frequency between polidocanol liquid injection and foam injection in the treatment of head and neck venous malformations under medical and nursing collaboration. METHODS: A total of 120 patients with head and neck venous malformations were treated with polidocanol sclerotherapy, of which 60 were treated with liquid injection and 60 with foam injection. All patients were classified into 4 groups respectively according to the types of venous malformations, namely, group A for typeⅠvenous malformation, group B for type Ⅱ venous malformation, group C for type Ⅲ venous malformation, and group D for type Ⅳ venous malformation. There were a total of 8 groups with 15 cases in each group. The therapeutic effect and the number of polidocanol injection were compared between each group. SPSS 23.0 software package was used for statistical analysis of the data. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in therapeutic effect between two injection methods in group A and group B, and the average number of injections was reduced by 0.5 with foam compared to liquid in group A and 1.2 in group B. The therapeutic effect of foam injection was better than that of liquid injection in group C and group D, but the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05), and the average number of injections was reduced by 2.7 with foam compared to liquid method in group C and 3.9 in group D. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of head and neck venous malformations, the therapeutic effect of foam injection is better than liquid injection for venous malformations with fast drainage. The faster the drainage of venous malformations, the greater is the reduction in average number of treatments with foam injection in relation to that with liquid injection. The reduction in the number of treatments is conducive to reducing patients’ economic burden, time consumption and incidence of adverse reactions, and thus foam injection is worth promoting and applying in clinical practice.

Key words: Polidocanol, Venous malformation, Sclerotherapy, Head and neck region

CLC Number: