China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (6): 567-572.doi: 10.19438/j.cjoms.2025.06.005

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation of the electric mouth opener on mouth-opening training effectiveness following temporomandibular joint disc repositioning surgery

Wang Pengcheng1, Gu Zhuming2, He Dongmei3   

  1. 1. Department of Stomatology, Jinhua Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Jinhua 321017, Zhejiang Province;
    2. Shanghai RIGS Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. Shanghai 200433;
    3. Department of Oral Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Shanghai 200011, China
  • Received:2025-06-19 Revised:2025-07-29 Online:2025-11-20 Published:2025-12-04

Abstract: PURPOSE: To introduce a self-developed electric mouth opener and evaluate its efficacy in postoperative mouth-opening exercise following temporomandibular joint disc repositioning surgery. METHODS: Thirty patients with maximal interincisal opening(MIO) <30 mm after open disc repositioning surgery for anterior disc displacement were randomly assigned to three training groups: manual stretching, stretching device group, and electric mouth opener. All groups underwent 6 weeks of home-based rehabilitation: the manual group performed finger-assisted stretching, the stretching device group used a traditional TMJ stretching brace, and the electric group used the self-developed four-speed adjustable electric mouth opener. MIO, pain degree, and mandibular function evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS) before training, at 2 weeks and 6 weeks after training were recorded and compared. RESULTS: No significant differences in preoperative or postoperative MIO existed among three groups. After 6 weeks of training, all groups showed significant MIO improvement versus baseline (P<0.05). The electric mouth opener group achieved optimal recovery [(39.2±1.5) mm], significantly exceeding both the stretching device group [(35.7±2.8) mm] and manual group [(32.1±4.0) mm]. Pain reduction was most pronounced in the electric group. At 6 weeks, both device-assisted groups showed higher mandibular function scores than the manual group, with the electric mouth opener group showing superior efficacy(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The electric mouth opener is safe and effective for accelerating postoperative MIO recovery in TMJ disc repositioning patients, offering advantages in operational simplicity and stability.

Key words: Temporomandibular joint disc repositioning surgery, Electric mouth opener, Mouth-opening exercise, Maximal interincisal opening

CLC Number: