Effect of different thermal insulation measures on the recovery from general anesthesia in patients with head and neck tumor

doi:10.19438/j.cjoms.2020.01.009

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: To study the effect of different thermal insulation measures on the recovery from general anesthesia in patients with head and neck tumor. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-five patients with head and neck tumor under general anesthesia from October 2017 to October 2018 were selected. According to the thermal insulation measures used during operation, the patients were divided into four groups: normal temperature group (group A, 31 patients), thermal insulation blanket group(group B, 36 patients), liquid heating meter group (group C, 32 patients) and integrated group (group D, 26 patients). Changes in blood pressure, body temperature, heart rate,extubation time, conscious recovery time and incidence of complication were compared among the four groups. The data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 5 software package. RESULTS: During the recovery phase, changes in body temperature, heart rate and blood pressure were significantly lower in group B, C and D than in group A, and lowest in group D (P﹤0.05). Extubation time and recovery time was significantly lower in group B, C and D than in group A, and lowest in group D (P﹤0.05). The incidence of complications was significantly lower in group B, C and D than in group A, and lowest in group D (P﹤0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Thermal insulation measures, especially integrated thermal insulation, can significantly improve the quality of anesthesia recovery, reduce the incidence of complications and improve the safety of anesthesia recovery.

Key words: Thermal insulation, General anesthesia, Head and neck tumors, Anesthesia recovery

CLC Number:

R739.8

LIN Yu, JIANG Jue, LYU Xiang. Effect of different thermal insulation measures on the recovery from general anesthesia in patients with head and neck tumor[J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2020, 18(1): 48-50.

References

[1] 邓小连. 不同术中保温措施对开腹手术患者低体温及手术感染的应用[J]. 中国继续医学教育, 2018, 10(22): 101-103.
[2] 雷勇静, 马开喜, 马燕, 等. 充气保温垫毯对老年腹部手术患者围术期体温变化的影响[J]. 吉林医学, 2018, 39(9): 1606-1608.
[3] 刘小平, 孙艳. 充气式保温毯预防老年胃癌根治术患者术中低体温的效果[J]. 中西医结合护理, 2018, 4(5): 119-121.
[4] 胡庆圆, 张成作. 保温护理对麻醉患者术后应激反应及并发症的影响[J]. 中国医药导报, 2017, 14: 173-176.
[5] 梅竹, 吴荷玉, 余文静, 等. 复合保温措施在直肠癌根治术中的应用研究[J]. 护理研究, 2016, 30(35): 4416-4418.
[6] 赵峰, 张环, 周学颖, 等. 复合保温对老年患者术中体温及术后复苏期的影响[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2017, 14(7): 1001-1003.
[7] 肖伟杰, 房特. 不同保温措施对全身麻醉肺癌患者手术麻醉恢复期的影响[J]. 中国肿瘤临床与康复, 2018, 25(3): 349-352.
[8] Ozkan H, Ekinci S, Uysal B, et al.Evaluation and comparison of the effect of hypothermia and ozone on ischemia-reperfusion injury of skeletal muscle in rats[J]. J Surg Res, 2015, 196(2): 313-319.
[9] 杨玉平, 唐安, 张霞, 等. 保温护理对全身麻醉吸脂整形患者术中应激及术后复苏的影响[J]. 中国美容整形外科杂志, 2018, 29(7): 429-431.
[10] Dhar P.Managing perioperative hypothermia[J]. J Anesth, 2000, 14(2): 91-97.
[11] Tasker RC, Vitali SH.Continuous infusion, general anesthesia and other intensive care treatment for uncontrolled status epilepticus[J]. Curr Opin Pediatr, 2014, 26(6): 682-689.
[12] 王韬甫. 术中保温对全麻手术患者术中生命体征及术后恢复的影响[J]. 医学临床研究, 2016, 33(10): 2054-2056.