Comparison of the effects of closed negative pressure drainage and traditional open drainage in maxillofacial space infection

doi:10.19438/j.cjoms.2021.04.014

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: To investigate the difference between closed negative pressure drainage and traditional open drainage in the treatment of maxillofacial space infection. METHODS: A total of 139 patients with maxillofacial space infection treated from February 2017 to August 2019 were selected and randomly divided into negative pressure group (closed negative pressure drainage, n=69) and traditional group (traditional incision drainage, n=70). Differences in visual analog scale (VAS) score, changes in serum procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), treatment effect, number of dressing changes, antibiotic use time, and granulation tissue growth time were compared between the two groups using SPSS 21.0 software package. RESULTS: Before treatment, there was no significant difference in VAS scores between the two groups (P>0.05). After 3 and 7 days of treatment, the VAS scores of the negative pressure group were significantly lower than the traditional group(P<0.05). Before treatment, there was no significant difference in serum CRP and PCT levels between the two groups(P>0.05). After 3 days and 7 days of treatment, the serum CRP and PCT levels of the negative pressure group were significantly lower than those of the traditional group (P<0.05); the number of dressing changes, antibiotic use time, and granulation tissue growth time of the negative pressure group were significantly lower than those of the traditional group (P<0.05); the curative rate and effective rate were 60.87%, 37.68% in the negative pressure group, and 44.29%, 51.43% in the traditional group. CONCLUSIONS: Closed negative pressure drainage is more effective than traditional incision drainage in treating maxillofacial space infection.

Key words: Closed negative pressure drainage, Open drainage, Maxillofacial space infection

CLC Number:

R782.3

JIN Ze-gao, CHENG Jie, LI Yan-fang, WANG Mi-la. Comparison of the effects of closed negative pressure drainage and traditional open drainage in maxillofacial space infection[J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2021, 19(4): 358-361.

References

[1] 蒲金霞, 李晨曦, 贺多敏,等. 126例口腔颌面部间隙感染患者治疗效果相关影响因素分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(5):491-494.
[2] 姚宇锋, 孙红玲, 许彩云, 等. 负压封闭引流技术在胸骨术后切口脂肪液化中的应用[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2018, 27(9): 1060-1061.
[3] 郭治辰, 胡旻, 龚忠诚,等. 不同年龄口腔颌面部间隙感染患者的临床特点分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(5):100-103.
[4] Carver DA, Bressan AK, Schieman C, et al.Management of haemothoraces in blunt thoracic trauma: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial[J]. BMJ Open, 2018, 8(3): e020378.
[5] Copeland AE, Hoffman CE, Tsitouras V, et al.Clinical significance of venous anomalies in syndromic craniosynostosis[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2018, 6(1): e1613.
[6] Eroglu U, Kahilogullari G, Dogan I, et al.Surgical management of supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhages: endoscopic versus open surgery[J]. World Neurosurg, 2018, 114:e60-e65.
[7] Khan MA, Hammad T, Khan Z, et al.Endoscopic versus percutaneous management for symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Endosc Int Open, 2018, 6(4): E474-E483.
[8] 张兆弢, 张风河. 负压封闭引流技术在儿童口腔颌面部间隙感染中的应用效果评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2019, 17(1):62-65.
[9] Kumar H, Gupta A, Gupta V.A microinvasive technique for management of corneal edema secondary to glaucoma drainage device tube-corneal touch[J]. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2018, 66(6): 861-862.
[10] Polydorou AA, Pantiora EV, Vezakis A, et al.Minimally invasive retroperitoneal approach for pancreatic necrosectomy via a percutaneous drainage tract[J]. Hellenic J Surg, 2018, 90(1):9-15.
[11] Reich MS, Ezzet KA.A nonsurgical protocol for management of postarthroplasty wound drainage[J]. Arthroplast Today, 2018, 4(1): 71-73.
[12] Park L, Baker L, Smith H, et al.Passive versus active intra-abdominal drainage following pancreatic resection: does a superior drainage system exist? A protocol for systematic review[J]. BMJ Open, 2019, 9(9): e031319.
[13] Teoh AY, Perez-Miranda M, Kunda R, et al.Outcomes of an international multicenter registry on EUS-guided gallbladder drainage in patients at high risk for cholecystectomy[J]. Endosc Int Open, 2019, 7(8): E964-E973.
[14] Kumar N, Singh SK, Pandey HK.Drainage morphometric analysis using open access earth observation datasets in a drought-affected part of Bundelkhand, India[J]. Applied Geomatics, 2018, 10(2):1-17.
[15] Webster J, Liu Z, Norman G, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019, 3(3):CD009261.