Screening and analysis of preoperative difficulty predictors for autotransplanation of tooth

doi:10.19438/j.cjoms.2020.02.008

China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ›› 2020, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2): 132-135.doi: 10.19438/j.cjoms.2020.02.008

• Original Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles

Screening and analysis of preoperative difficulty predictors for autotransplanation of tooth

HUI Xiao-yong^1,2, HOU Rui¹, XU Guang-jie³, LI Zhi-wen¹, YANG Xia¹, ZHOU Hong-zhi¹, ZHANG Hao⁴, SHANG Lei⁴

1.State Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shaanxi Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral Surgery, School of Stomatology, Air Force Military Medical University. Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi Province;
2.Guangzhou Sanatorium of PLA Rocket Force. Guangzhou 512000, Guangdong Province;
3.Eastern Theater Command Naval Hospital. Zhoushan 316000, Zhejiang Province;
4.Department of Health Statistics of Military Preventive Medicine, Air Force Military Medical University. Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi Province, China

Received:2019-05-27 Revised:2019-07-31 Online:2020-03-20 Published:2020-04-30

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE： The purpose of this study was to design a difficulty prediction scale before autotransplanation of tooth (ATT) which was verified by statistical analysis. METHODS: Based on the literature and clinical experience, all of the possible factors for difficulty prediction before ATT were summarized. Eleven factors with high correlation were screened out and tabulated. The actual difficulty was verified by clinical cases. Statistical analysis was performed to check the reliability and validity of the scale with SPSS 23.0 software package. RESULTS: Data were expressed as follows, Cronbach's alpha (reliability value) was 0.853, Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCCs, content validity value) was 0.745, and Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO, structural validity value) was 0.704. CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative difficulty prediction scale designed for ATT is reasonable and feasible. It is suitable for residents to make analysis of preoperative difficulty prediction.

Key words: Autotransplanation of tooth, Difficulty prediction, Reliability, Validity

CLC Number:

R782.1

HUI Xiao-yong, HOU Rui, XU Guang-jie, LI Zhi-wen, YANG Xia, ZHOU Hong-zhi, ZHANG Hao, SHANG Lei. Screening and analysis of preoperative difficulty predictors for autotransplanation of tooth[J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2020, 18(2): 132-135.

References

[1] Hale ML.Autogenous transplants[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1956, 9(1): 76-83.
[2] Tsukiboshi M.Autotransplantation of Teeth[M]. Chicago: Quintessence Pub. Co., 2001.
[3] 侯锐. 自体牙移植术:自体牙移植术简介[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2013, 6(8): 449-452.
[4] Yang S, Jung B, Pang N.Outcomes of autotransplanted teeth and prognostic factors: a 10-year retrospective study[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2019, 23(1): 87-98.
[5] Strbac GD, Giannis K, Mittlböck M, et al.Survival rate of autotransplanted teeth after 5 years-A retrospective cohort study[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2017, 45(8): 1143-1149.
[6] Rohof ECM, Kerdijk W, Jansma J, et al.Autotransplantation of teeth with incomplete root formation: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2018, 22(4): 1613-1624.
[7] Machado LA, Do Nascimento RR, Ferreira DM, et al.Long-term prognosis of tooth autotransplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016, 45(5): 610-617.
[8] 郝元涛, 孙希凤, 方积乾, 等. 量表条目筛选的统计学方法研究[J]. 中国卫生统计杂志, 2004, 21(4): 209-211.
[9] Devellisa RF, 著. 量表编制理论与应用[M]. 魏勇刚, 龙长权, 宋武, 译. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010.
[10] 郑锐. 也谈统计工作的“工匠精神”[J]. 中国统计, 2019, 67(2): 76-77.
[11] Mertens B, Boukari A, Tenenbaum H.Long-term follow up of post-surgical tooth autotransplantation: a retrospective study[J]. J Investig Clin Dent, 2016, 7(2): 207-214.
[12] 侯锐, 许广杰, 惠小勇, 等. 自体牙移植300例临床分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2018, 16(1): 25-28.
[13] Kim S, Shin SJ, Park JW, et al.Long-term stability of autotransplanted premolars as a substitute for molars in adults[J]. J Endod, 2016,42(8):1286-1290.
[14] Kafourou V, Tong HJ, Day P, et al.Outcomes and prognostic factors that influence the success of tooth autotransplantation in children and adolescents[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2017, 33(5): 393-399.
[15] Plakwicz P, Wojtowicz A, Czochrowska EM.Survival and success rates of autotransplanted premolars: A prospective study of the protocol for developing teeth[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2013, 144(2): 229-237.
[16] Kim S, Lee SJ, Shin Y, et al.Vertical bone growth after autotransplantation of mature third molars: 2 case reports with long-term follow-up[J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(8): 1371-1374.
[17] Pohl Y, Filippi A, Kirschner H.Extraoral endodontic treatment by retrograde insertion of posts: A long-term study on replanted and transplanted teeth[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2003, 95(3): 355-363.
[18] 米施著美. 现代口腔种植学 [M]. 第3版. 北京: 人民军医出版社, 2015.
[19] 周宏志, 胡开进, 秦瑞峰, 等. 下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除难度预判[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2009, 25(3): 327-329.

Screening and analysis of preoperative difficulty predictors for autotransplanation of tooth

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 2

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LIU Min, ZHANG Yong-mei, YUAN Wei-jun, HOU Li-li. Construction and preliminary verification of the assessment scale of nurses' oral and maxillofacial trauma emergency response capacity [J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2024, 22(4): 346-352.
[2]	YING Yuan-jie, ZHANG Li, YANG Xu, XUE Hui-min, HUANG Yan, YANG Yue-lai. Evaluation of the clinical value of the Chinese version of ELPO surgery position-related pressure ulcer risk assessment scale in oral and craniomaxillofacial tumor surgery [J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2020, 18(4): 333-337.