Comparison of two methods for removal of mandibular third molar with mesioangular and horizontal impaction

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: To compare the clinical efficacy of T-shaped splitting combining Turbo-drill removal with traditional extraction in removal of mandibular third molar with mesioangular and horizontal impaction. METHODS: A total of 138 patients who required removal of mandibular third molar with mesioangular and horizontal impaction were included in this study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: group A (70 cases) and group B (68 cases). Patients in group A underwent extraction of the impacted mandibular third molar with T-shaped splitting combining Turbo-drill removal technique, while patients in group B underwent mandibular third molar extraction with traditional method. The operation time, intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded to assess the effects of two methods. SPPSS 13.0 software package was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The intraoperative and postoperative complication incidence in group A was significantly lower than that of group B (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The method of T-shaped splitting combining Turbo-drill in removal of mandibular third molar with mesioangular and horizontal impaction is safe and with fewer complications. It is worthy of wide clinical application.

Key words: Impacted tooth, T-shaped splitting, Traditional extraction

CLC Number:

R782.11

LIU Jun-ping, HOU Xu, ZHAO Xiao-peng, WANG Jian-guang,PAN Chao-bin. Comparison of two methods for removal of mandibular third molar with mesioangular and horizontal impaction[J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2014, 12(3): 239-242.

References

【1】邱蔚六. 口腔颌面外科学 . 第6 版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2008: 91-98.
【2】Sammartino G, Tia M, Bucci T, et al. Prevention of mandibular third molar extraction-associated periodontal defects:a compar-ative study . J Periodontol, 2009, 80(3): 389-396.
【3】Sammartino G, Tia M, Gentile E, et al. Platelet-rich plasma and resorbable membrane for prevention of periodontal defects after deeply impacted lower third molar extraction . J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009, 67(11): 2369-2373.
【4】孟凡文, 壮荣, 吴晓亮, 等. 下颌阻生智齿两种拔除方法疗效比较. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2011, 4(8): 46-48.
【5】徐光宙,俞创奇.阻生下颌第三磨牙的治疗及并发症研究进展. 口腔颌面外科杂志, 2010, 20(4): 289-292.
【6】Huang GJ, Rue TC. Third-molar extraction as a risk factor for temporomandibular disorder . J Am Dent Assoc, 2006, 137(11): 1547-1554.
【7】de Jongh A, Muris P, Schoenmakers N, et al. Nagative cognitions of dental phobics: reliability and validity of the dental cognitions questionnaire . Behav Res Ther, 1995, 33(5): 507-515.
【8】张雪晶, 刘利君, 杨少清. 拔牙病人牙科焦虑心理的研究 . 广东牙病防治, 2001, 9(4): 254-255.
【9】唐成芳, 李晓红, 安虹, 等. 牙科焦虑症患者治疗中医患关系的研究. 中国医学伦理学, 2005, 18(1): 68-69.
【10】赵小朋, 潘朝斌, 叶华山. “T形”劈冠法在下颌中位近中水平阻生智牙拔除术中的应用. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2011, 9(6): 491-493.
【11】Jerjes W, El-Maaytah M, Swinson B, et al. Inferior alveolar nerve injury and surgical difficulty prediction in third molar surgery: the role of dental panoramic tomography. J Clin Dent,2006,17(5):122-130.
【12】Yuasa H, Kawai T, Surgiura M. Classification of surgical difficulty in extracting impacted third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2002, 40(1): 26-31.
【13】梅银娥, 周春泉. 下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术并发症分析 . 临床口腔医学杂志, 2009, 25(12): 735-736.

[1]	ZHOU Xing-an, BAI Yun-fei, ZHOU Yan-yan, SHANG Duo, SHEN Tie-bing, DELEHEI Bateer. A case of endoscopic-assisted removal of an maxillary low inverted impacted tooth with cyst in a child in the mixed dentition stage [J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2024, 22(3): 309-312.
[2]	DING Zuo-you, ZHU Guang-lai, XIU Li-jun. Influence of wound healing with or without wound suture after extraction of mandibular impacted teeth [J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2021, 19(1): 18-21.
[3]	CHANG Zhong-fu, LU Li-quan, JIANG Dan-dan, ZHANG Zhi-rong, CAI Jian-ying, ZHANG Li-hua. Minimally invasive tooth extraction of impacted wisdom teeth and its impact on VAS score and stress response [J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2020, 18(3): 260-263.
[4]	LIU Zhi-yang, CHEN Min-jie, ZHANG Wei-jie, WEI Wen-bin, HAN Zi-xiang, CHAI Ying. Application of three-dimensional reconstruction technique in clinical teaching of mandibular third molar extraction [J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2020, 18(1): 68-70.
[5]	DING Feng, WU Xian, YANG Xi-hu, ZHOU Fei-jun, DING Xiao-jun. Comparison of piezosurgery device and traditional method in extraction of horizontally impacted mandibular third molar [J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2019, 17(5): 431-435.
[6]	BAI Xi-jing, LV Dong-sheng, ZHOU Xian, WANG Ya-nan, YANG Xue-wen. Effect of collagen sponge after extraction of impacted mandibular teeth [J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2019, 17(2): 155-158.
[7]	ZHANG Jie, SHEN Guo-hua, LV Xiang, WANG Xiao-ying, LI Chun-yan. Evaluation of the clinical effects of 45 degree turbine drill in 64 patients with lower horizontally impacted mandibular third molar [J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2016, 14(6): 542-544.
[8]	WANG Fei, YU Wen-ting, LIANG Yan-can, CHENG Hui-lin, JIAO Jiu-yang, LU Ying-juan, CHEN Wei-liang. Application of celecoxib in analgesia for patients who underwent extraction of impacted tooth [J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2014, 12(1): 65-68.