中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (2): 149-153.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

2种下颌骨切除方式对口腔鳞癌预后的影响

邱宇, 林李嵩, 施斌, 朱小峰, 黄立, 黄跃, 廖云阳   

  1. 福建医科大学附属第一医院 口腔颌面外科,福建医科大学 面部整复与重建研究室,福建 福州 350005
  • 收稿日期:2015-10-26 出版日期:2016-03-20 发布日期:2016-04-06
  • 通讯作者: 林李嵩,Tel:0591-87982098,E-mail:dr_lls@163.com
  • 作者简介:邱宇(1978-),男,硕士,主治医师,E-mail:qy97@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    福建省卫生和计划生育委员会青年课题(2013-2-46)

A preliminary study on different prognoses of oral squamous cell carcinoma treated with marginal mandibulectomy and segmental mandibulectomy

QIU Yu, LIN Li-song, SHI Bin, ZHU Xiao-feng, HUANG Li, HUANG Yue, LIAO Yun-yang   

  1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University. Laboratory of Facial Plastic and Reconstruction of Fujian Medical University. Fuzhou 350005, Fujian Province, China
  • Received:2015-10-26 Online:2016-03-20 Published:2016-04-06

摘要: 目的:分析比较2种不同下颌骨切除术式对口腔鳞癌预后的影响,探讨影响复发率的因素。方法:回顾2001年1月—2015年1月由同一组医师实施的82例涉及下颌骨的口腔癌手术,其中39例行下颌骨边缘性切除,43例行下颌骨节段性切除。采用SPSS19.0软件包对2种手术方式的复发率、生存率进行Kaplan-Meier分析和Log-rank检验,采用Cox回归模型进行单因素和多因素生存分析。结果:下颌骨边缘性切除组3年复发率为29.1%,下颌骨节段性切除组为18.4%,2组之间无显著差异(P=0.165);下颌骨边缘性切除组的5年复发率为39.7%,节段性切除组为34.2%,2组之间无显著差异(P=0.460)。边缘性切除组3年生存率为75.2%,节段性切除组为69.2%,2组之间比较无显著差异(P=0.263);边缘性切除组5年生存率为55.5%,节段性切除组为60.7%,2组之间无显著差异(P=0.816)。Cox多因素分析表明,低分化是术后局部复发的唯一高危因素(P=0.001)。结论:对合适的病例采取下颌骨边缘性切除,是安全、有效的手术方法。对低分化患者,应更加注意术后随访。

关键词: 口腔鳞癌, 下颌骨切除, 预后分析

Abstract: PURPOSE: To compare the different prognosis between marginal mandibulectomy(MG)and segmental mandibulectomy(SG)for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and investigate the influential factors of prognosis. METHODS: Eighty-two oral carcinoma operations involving mandibulectomy (between January 2001 and January 2015) were evaluated retrospectively. Of the 82 patients, 39 had marginal mandibulectomy,43 had segmental mandibulectomy. The local recurrent rate and survival rate of these 2 treatment modalities were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier using SPSS 19.0 software package. Cox regression model was used to determine the risk factors for recurrence. RESULTS: Three-year and 5-year local recurrent rate was 29.1% and 39.7% in MG group, and 18.4%, 34.2% respectively in SG group. The local recurrent rate between the two groups had no significant difference (P>0.05). Three-year and 5-year survival rate was 75.2%t and 55.5% in MG group, and 69.2%, 60.7% respectively in SG group. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Lowly differentiated pathologic type was the only influential factor for prognosis in multivariate Cox regression analysis(P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Marginal mandibulectomy is a safe and effective operative in appropriate cases. For patients with lowly differentiated OSCC, close follow-up is more important for early detection of recurrence.

Key words: Oral squamous cell carcinoma, Mandible mandibulectomy, Prognosis analysis

中图分类号: