“盾构术”应用于美学区种植的研究进展

doi:10.19438/j.cjoms.2022.02.018

中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (2): 198-201.doi: 10.19438/j.cjoms.2022.02.018

“盾构术”应用于美学区种植的研究进展

周亦凝, 顾迎新

上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院口腔种植科,上海交通大学口腔医学院,国家口腔医学中心,国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,上海市口腔医学重点实验室,上海 200011

收稿日期:2021-06-10 修回日期:2021-07-05 出版日期:2022-03-20 发布日期:2022-03-20
通讯作者: 顾迎新,E-mail：yingxingu@163.com
作者简介:周亦凝（1998-）,女,在读本科生,E-mail：ynezzhou@126.com

Research progress on socket shield technique concurrent with implantation in aesthetic area

ZHOU Yi-ning, GU Ying-xin

Department of Oral Implantology, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011, China

Received:2021-06-10 Revised:2021-07-05 Online:2022-03-20 Published:2022-03-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 上前牙美学区在拔牙后常发生唇侧牙槽骨吸收、塌陷,极大影响种植后前牙区的美学效果。为了尽可能保存唇侧软、硬组织,近年来有学者提出了“盾构术”的概念,即通过保留唇侧部分牙根,以保存束状骨-牙周膜复合体,从而减少吸收。本文就“盾构术”近年来的研究进展进行回顾,并对影响“盾构术”效果的因素及其较传统即刻种植的优势与局限性进行综述。

关键词: 盾构术, 即刻种植, 硬组织保存, 美学区

Abstract: Resorption of labial bone plate due to teeth extraction can affect the aesthetic outcome of maxillary anterior teeth negatively, therefore, socket shield technique was introduced to reduce labial bone loss by preserving bundle bone-periodontal ligament apparatus. This article reviewed related literatures of socket shield technique in recent years, summarizing the advantages and limitations of the technique compared with conventional immediate implantation, and factors that influence its effectiveness.

Key words: Socket shield technique, Immediate implantation, Hard tissue preservation, Aesthetic areav

中图分类号:

R782.1

周亦凝, 顾迎新. “盾构术”应用于美学区种植的研究进展[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(2): 198-201.

ZHOU Yi-ning, GU Ying-xin. Research progress on socket shield technique concurrent with implantation in aesthetic area[J]. China J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2022, 20(2): 198-201.

参考文献

[1] Araújo MG, Lindhe J.Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2005, 32(2):212-218.
[2] Gluckman H, Du Toit J.The management of recession midfacial to immediately placed implants in the aesthetic zone[J]. Int Dent African Edition, 2015, 5(1): 6-15.
[3] Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, et al.Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2003, 23(4): 313-323.
[4] Hämmerle C, Araújo M, Simion M, et al.Evidence-based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(suppl 5): 80-82.
[5] Bäumer D, Zuhr O, Rebele S, et al.The socket-shield technique: first histological, clinical, and volumetrical observations after separation of the buccal tooth segment-a pilot study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015, 17(1): 71-82.
[6] Hürzeler MB, Zuhr O, Schupbach P, et al.The socket shield technique: a proof-of-principle report[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2010, 37(9):855-862.
[7] Schwimer C, Pette GA, Gluckman H, et al.Human histologic evidence of new bone formation and osseointegration between root dentin (unplanned socket-shield) and dental implant: case report[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2018, 33(1): e19-e23.
[8] Gluckman H, Salama M, Du Toit J.Partial extraction therapies (PET)part 2: procedures and technical aspects[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2017, 37(3): 377-385.
[9] Cherel F, Etienne D.Papilla preservation between two implants: a modified socket-shield technique to maintain the scalloped anatomy? A case report[J]. Quintessence Int, 2014, 45(1): 23-30.
[10] Bäumer D, Zuhr O, Rebele S, et al.Socket-shield technique for immediate implant placement-clinical, radiographic and volumetric data after 5 years[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017, 28(11): 1450-1458.
[11] Gluckman H, Pontes CC, Du Toit J.Radial plane tooth position and bone wall dimensions in the anterior maxilla: a CBCT classification for immediate implant placement[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2018, 120(1): 50-56.
[12] Gluckman H, Du Toit J, Salama M, et al.A decade of the socket-shield technique: a step-by-step partial extraction therapy protocol[J]. Int J Esthet Dent, 2020, 15(2): 212-225.
[13] Gluckman H, Nagy K, Du Toit J.Prosthetic management of implants placed with the socket-shield technique[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2019, 121(4): 581-585.
[14] Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Buser D, et al.The jumping distance revisited: an experimental study in the dog[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2003, 14(1): 35-42.
[15] Mourya A, Mishra SK, Gaddale R, et al.Socket-shield technique for implant placement to stabilize the facial gingival and osseous architecture: a systematic review[J]. J Investig Clin Dent, 2019, 10(4): e12449.
[16] Guo T, Nie R, Xin X, et al.Tissue preservation through socket-shield technique and platelet-rich fibrin in immediate implant placement: a case report[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018, 97(50): e13175.
[17] Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K.Proximal socket shield for interimplant papilla preservation in the esthetic zone[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2013, 33(1): e24-e31.
[18] Cherel F, Etienne D.Papilla preservation between two implants: a modified socket-shield technique to maintain the scalloped anatomy: a case report[J]. Quintessence Intl, 2014, 45(1): 23-30.
[19] 高涵琪, 杨振, 陈立, 等.美学区双导板引导的牙片盾构和即刻种植术[A]//中华口腔医学会口腔修复学专业委员. 2020中华口腔医学会口腔修复学专业委员会第十四次全国口腔修复学学术会议论文摘要汇编[C]. 中华口腔医学会口腔修复学专业委员会:中华口腔医学会, 2020: 46-46.
[20] Glocker M, Thomas A, Schmidin PR.Ridge preservation with modified "socket-shield" technique: a methodological case series[J]. Dent J, 2014, 2(1): 11-21.
[21] Abd-Elrahman A, Shaheen M, Askar N, et al.Socket shield technique vs conventional immediate implant placement with immediate temporization. Randomized clinical trial[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2020, 22(5): 602-611.
[22] Gluckman H, Salama M, Du Toit J.A retrospective evaluation of 128 socket-shield cases in the esthetic zone and posterior sites: partial extraction therapy with up to 4 years follow-up[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2018, 20(2): 122-129.
[23] Tiwari S, Bedi RS, Wadhwani P, et al.Comparison of immediate implant placement following extraction with and without socket-shield technique in esthetic region[J]. J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 2020, 19(4): 552-560.
[24] Sun C, Zhao J, Liu Z, et al.Comparing conventional flap-less immediate implantation and socket-shield technique for esthetic and clinical outcomes: a randomized clinical study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2020, 31(2): 181-191.
[25] Morton D, Chen ST, Martin WC, et al.Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding optimizing esthetic outcomes in implant dentistry[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014, 29(Suppl): 216-220.
[26] Bramanti E, Norcia A, Cicciù M, et al.Post extraction dental implant in the aesthetic zone, socket shield technique versus conventional protocol[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2018, 29(4): 1037-1041.
[27] Gharpure AS, Bhatavadekar NB.Current evidence on the socket-shield technique: a systematic review[J]. J Oral Implantol, 2017, 43(5): 395-403.
[28] Troiano M, Benincasa M, Sánchez P, et al.Bundle bone preservation with Root-T-Belt: a case study[J]. Ann Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2014, 2(1): 7-8.
[29] Abadzhiev M, Nenkov P, Velcheva P.Conventional immediate implant placement and immediate placement with socket-shield technique which is better[J]. Int J Clin Med Res, 2014, 1(5): 176-180.

“盾构术”应用于美学区种植的研究进展

Research progress on socket shield technique concurrent with implantation in aesthetic area

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙守福, 张莹, 赵昊明, 王文超, 魏文佳, 郭克. 数字化导板辅助下左上根折中切牙不翻瓣即刻种植即刻自体冠修复1例报告[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(2): 197-202.
[2]	姚晨阳, 梅东梅, 滕敏华, 徐昊, 王文雪, 李晶, 周琛, 赵保东. 上颌前牙区根盾术即刻种植与常规即刻种植的临床效果评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2021, 19(6): 511-516.
[3]	李晶, 梅东梅, 姜雅萍, 徐昊, 王文雪, 姚晨阳, 李亚男, 赵保东. 2 mm矮愈合基台在前牙美学区早期种植骨增量中的效果分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2021, 19(6): 531-535.
[4]	姚晨阳, 梅东梅, 滕敏华, 徐昊, 王文雪, 李晶, 周琛, 赵保东. 上颌前牙区根盾术即刻种植与常规即刻种植的临床效果评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2021, 19(6): 536-541.
[5]	张楚南, 赵旭, 乔士冲, 张晓梦, 顾迎新. 拔牙窝内植入不同深度骨水平种植体周围软硬组织改建的组织形态变化[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2021, 19(3): 193-196.
[6]	孙亮, 曲哲. 即刻种植翻瓣与不翻瓣术临床疗效分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(2): 144-147.
[7]	李敬华, 姜文静, 王艳辉, 李晓静, 柏娜. 下颌前牙唇侧骨壁厚度及倾斜角度对即刻种植术前设计的影响[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2019, 17(3): 230-234.
[8]	万绍楠, 杨驰, 浦益萍. 上颌前牙美学区牙槽骨骨量及形态的研究[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2019, 17(3): 240-246.
[9]	万绍楠, 浦益萍, 杨驰. 后牙区即刻种植与延期种植后牙槽骨吸收的影像学比较分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2019, 17(2): 150-154.
[10]	欧阳骞, 黄燕飞, 杨向红, 李德宏, 周静. 即刻种植联合组织清理术对犬种植体周围软组织形态的影响[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2018, 16(4): 334-337.
[11]	张楚南, 倪杰, 莫嘉骥, 乔士冲, 王蓓, 顾迎新. 美学区种植同期应用异种骨行引导骨再生术后愈合期间唇侧骨改建的临床研究[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2018, 16(1): 29-33.