中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 133-138.doi: 10.19438/j.cjoms.2026.02.006

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

晚期舌癌全舌切除的手术治疗:62例临床分析

许慧霞, 寇家豪, 李馥焰, 江晨曦, 曹婷, 孙国文   

  1. 南京大学医学院附属口腔医院,南京市口腔医院,南京大学口腔医学研究所,江苏 南京 210008
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-14 修回日期:2025-10-31 出版日期:2026-03-20 发布日期:2026-04-02
  • 通讯作者: 孙国文,E-mail:238957@sina.com
  • 作者简介:许慧霞(1998—),女,在读硕士研究生,E-mail: 3201479607@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    南京市卫生科技发展专项资金项目(YKK22183)

Surgical treatment of total glossectomy for advanced tongue cancer: a clinical analysis of 62 cases

Xu Huixia, Kou Jiahao, Li Fuyan, Jiang Chenxi, Cao Ting, Sun Guowen   

  1. Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School; Institute of Stomatology, Nanjing University. Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2025-08-14 Revised:2025-10-31 Online:2026-03-20 Published:2026-04-02

摘要: 目的: 回顾需全舌切除的晚期舌癌患者的手术资料及相关预后数据,为该类患者的手术决策与优化提供参考。方法: 收集2013年1月—2024年12月南京大学医学院附属口腔医院收治的62例晚期舌癌全舌切除患者的临床资料,根据手术方式分为两组—A组(40例)行病灶切除+颈淋巴清扫,B组(22例)行En bloc切除(颈部大块组织与舌癌病灶整体切除)。采用Kaplan-Meier法分析生存率,Cox比例风险回归模型分析复发、转移的影响因素。结果: A组复发、转移率为17.50%(7/40),3年生存率为75.00%;B组复发、转移率为22.73%(5/22),3年生存率为68.18%。Cox回归分析显示,术式选择与术后复发转移无显著关联(P=0.537);两组生存曲线无统计学差异(P=0.505)。亚组分析显示,无论淋巴结状态为pN0-pN1(P=0.879)还是 pN2-pN3(P=0.523),两组生存率均无显著差异。淋巴结状态(pN2-pN3∶pN0-pN1,HR=4.193,P=0.02)及淋巴结包膜外侵犯(ENE阳性,HR=4.158,P=0.016)是术后复发、转移的独立危险因素。结论: 晚期舌癌患者生存率较低,手术需根据颈淋巴结及肿瘤侵犯情况进行综合考虑。对于术前临床检查或影像学未提示有颈淋巴结转移或肿瘤突入下颌下间隙的患者,可考虑选择“病灶切除+颈淋巴清扫”若已有淋巴结转移或肿瘤已突入下颌下间隙,则应行En bloc切除,术中均应重视口底区域的处理。术中形成的软组织缺损,应综合多种因素选择合适的修复方式。

关键词: 晚期舌癌, En bloc切除, 颈淋巴清扫术, 全舌切除, 皮瓣修复

Abstract: PURPOSE: To review the surgical data and related prognostic data of patients with advanced tongue cancer requiring total glossectomy, and to provide a reference for surgical decision-making and optimization in such patients. METHODS: Clinical data of 62 patients with advanced tongue cancer who underwent total glossectomy in Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University from January 2013 to December 2024 were collected. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical methods: group A(n=40) underwent lesion resection + neck dissection, and group B (n=22) underwent En bloc resection (En bloc removal of large cervical tissue and tongue cancer lesions). Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the survival rate, and Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to analyze the influencing factors of recurrence and metastasis. RESULTS: The recurrence and metastasis rate of group A was 17.50%(7/40), with a 3-year survival rate of 75.00%; the recurrence and metastasis rate of group B was 22.73% (5/22), with a 3-year survival rate of 68.18%. Cox regression analysis showed that there was no significant correlation between surgical method selection and postoperative recurrence and metastasis (P=0.537). There was no significant difference in the survival curves between the two groups (P=0.505). Subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference in survival rate between the two groups regardless of lymph node status(pN0-pN1, P=0.879; pN2-pN3, P=0.523). Lymph node status (pN2-pN3 vs pN0-pN1, HR=4.193, P=0.02) and extranodal extension(ENE positive, HR=4.158, P=0.016) were independent risk factors for postoperative recurrence and metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: The survival rate of patients with advanced tongue cancer is relatively low, and surgical plans should be comprehensively considered based on cervical lymph node status and tumor invasion. For patients with no preoperative clinical examination or imaging evidence of cervical lymph node metastasis or tumor protrusion into the submandibular space, "lesion resection + neck dissection" can be considered. If lymph node metastasis has occurred or the tumor has protruded into the submandibular space, En bloc resection should be performed, and attention should be paid to the management of the floor of mouth during operation. For soft tissue defects formed during operation, an appropriate repair method should be selected based on comprehensive consideration of multiple factors.

Key words: Advanced tongue cancer, En bloc resection, Neck dissection, Total glossectomy, Flap repair

中图分类号: