中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 35-39.doi: 10.19438/j.cjoms.2025.01.007

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

《上海市级医院口腔癌规范诊疗评价指标(试用版)》的制订

叶晨, 王延安, 何悦   

  1. 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院 口腔颌面-头颈肿瘤科,上海交通大学口腔医学院,国家口腔医学中心,国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,上海市口腔医学重点实验室,上海市口腔医学研究所,上海 200011
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-13 修回日期:2024-12-22 出版日期:2025-01-20 发布日期:2025-01-23
  • 通讯作者: 何悦,E-mail: william5218@126.com
  • 作者简介:叶晨(1975-),女,硕士,副编审,E-mail: belindayeyyy@hotmail.com

The development of multidisciplinary quality metrics for oral cavity cancer in Shanghai tertiary hospitals

YE Chen, WANG Yan-an, HE Yue   

  1. Department of Oromaxillofacial Head and Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology; Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011, China
  • Received:2024-11-13 Revised:2024-12-22 Online:2025-01-20 Published:2025-01-23

摘要: 目的:为进一步加强医疗质量管理,规范临床诊疗行为,研究制订《上海市级医院口腔癌规范诊疗评价指标(试用版)》。方法:对口腔癌规范诊疗及质量评价进行系统文献检索,成立多学科工作小组进行头脑风暴,征集遴选指标。院内专家小组多轮评价筛选指标,反复修改直至达成一致意见后,提交同行专家(非院内专家小组成员)以RAM法确定指标合理性,最后制作指标索引卡片。结果:工作小组头脑风暴提出评价指标38个;专家小组进行讨论后修改再讨论,共3轮筛选至31个指标;同行专家RAM法评价有3个指标意见不一致,再经院内专家小组讨论调整,最终达成一致意见。结论:共确定31项指标,从口腔癌的诊断、外科治疗、药物治疗、放射治疗和管理5个维度评价口腔癌全生命周期诊疗质量。

关键词: 口腔癌, 规范诊疗, 诊疗质量, 评价指标

Abstract: PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a set of criteria and indicators to evaluate the quality of care of patients with oral cavity cancer in Shanghai tertiary hospitals. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify valuable criteria/indicators for the assessment of the quality of care in oral cavity cancer. A multidisciplinary working group in oral cavity cancer used selected criteria to propose indicators that were evaluated by an in-hospital expert panel. Indicators on which consensus was achieved after many discussions were then reviewed by peer review to develop a final set of indicators following RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. Finally, index cards for each indicator were developed. RESULTS: A list of 38 indicators were proposed through brainstorming at first. After three round of discussion and adjustment, there was consensus on the 31 indicators. With the RAM review of appropriateness of indicators, 28 of 31 proposed indicators achieved consensus, the remaining 3 achieved consensus after the discussion of in-hospital expert panel as the indicators for Shanghai tertiary hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: A set of 31 evidence-based and expert-supported indicators were developed for evaluating the quality of care measures for oral cavity cancer, covering diagnosis, surgical treatment, drug treatment, radiation therapy and administration.

Key words: Oral cavity cancer, Standardized diagnosis and treatment, Quality of care measures, Evaluation indicators

中图分类号: