2种CAD/CAM口腔数字化导板精度的比较

doi:10.19438/j.cjoms.2023.01.005

中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (1): 29-35.doi: 10.19438/j.cjoms.2023.01.005

2种CAD/CAM口腔数字化导板精度的比较

戴小锋¹, 黄昕¹, 李成¹, 王辰昕¹, 施乐^1,*, 余优成^2,*

1.上海市静安区牙病防治所,上海 200040;
2.复旦大学附属中山医院口腔科,上海 200032

收稿日期:2022-07-17 修回日期:2022-08-29 出版日期:2023-01-20 发布日期:2023-06-12
通讯作者: 施乐,E-mail: 13003162720@163.com;余优成,E-mail: yu.youcheng@zs-hospital.sh.cn。^*共同通信作者
作者简介:戴小锋（1979-）,男,硕士,副主任医师,E-mail: xiaofengdai2008@163.com
基金资助:
上海市静安区科学技术委员会面上项目（面上2018MS24）; 上海市卫生健康委员会面上项目（面上202040037）

Comparative study on accuracy of 2 kinds of CAD/CAM dental digital guide plates in dental implantation

DAI Xiao-feng¹, HUANG Xin¹, LI Cheng¹, WANG Chen-xin¹, SHI Le¹, YU You-cheng²

1. Dental Disease Prevention and Control Institute of Shanghai Jing'an District. Shanghai 200040;
2. Department of Stomatology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. Shanghai 200032, China

Received:2022-07-17 Revised:2022-08-29 Online:2023-01-20 Published:2023-06-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的： 比较2种CAD/CAM口腔数字化导板的精度。方法： 选择上海市静安区牙病防治所就诊的36例口腔种植患者,均行CBCT检查和口内激光扫描,所获数据导入3Shape软件,进行术前设计。每个病例生成2个导板,A导板数据来自CBCT,B导板数据为CBCT和口内激光扫描数据的拟合,随机选择导板类型并使用。术后拍摄CBCT并将数据导入设计软件,与种植前设计的位置进行比较。采用R语言4.1.0对数据进行统计学分析。结果： B导板组种植体顶部中心点距离偏差、种植体底部中心点距离偏差和两中心点连线的角度偏差显著小于A导板组（P<0.05）。结论： CBCT和口内激光扫描数据拟合生成的CAD/CAM口腔数字化导板精度更高,有利于提高种植体植入的三维位置精确度。

关键词: 数字化导板, 口腔种植, 精度

Abstract: PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of 2 kinds of CAD/CAM dental digital guides in dental implantation. METHODS: A total of 36 patients with oral implants from Dental Disease Prevention and Control Institute of Shanghai Jing’an District were selected for CBCT examination and intraoral laser scanning. The data obtained were imported into 3Shape software and designed before operation. Two guides were generated in each case. Data of A guide plate came from the fitting of CBCT, while data of B guide plate for CBCT and intraoral laser scanning, and the type of guide plate was randomly selected and used. After operation, CBCT was taken and the data were imported into the design software, and the position of the design before implantation was compared. R software (version 4.1.0) was used for data analysis. RESULTS: The distance deviation of the top center point of the implant, the distance deviation of the center point at the bottom of the implant and the angle deviation of the line connecting the two center points in B guide plate group were significantly lower than those in A guide plate (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of CAD/CAM dental digital guide plate generated by the fitting of CBCT and intraoral laser scanning data is higher, which is helpful to improve the accuracy of three-dimensional position of dental implant.

Key words: Digital guide plate, Dental implant, Accuracy

中图分类号:

R782.1

戴小锋, 黄昕, 李成, 王辰昕, 施乐, 余优成. 2种CAD/CAM口腔数字化导板精度的比较[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(1): 29-35.

DAI Xiao-feng, HUANG Xin, LI Cheng, WANG Chen-xin, SHI Le, YU You-cheng. Comparative study on accuracy of 2 kinds of CAD/CAM dental digital guide plates in dental implantation[J]. China J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2023, 21(1): 29-35.

参考文献

[1] Marlière DAA, Demètrio MS, Picinini LS, et al.Accuracy of computer- guided surgery for dental implant placement in fully edentulous patients: a systematic review[J]. Eur J Dent, 2018, 12(1): 153-160.
[2] Spies BC, Fross A, Adolfsson E, et al.Stability and aging resistance of a zirconia oral implant using a carbon fiber-reinforced screw for implant-abutment connection[J]. Dent Mater, 2018, 34(10): 1585-1595.
[3] 史俊宇, 赖漪娆, 王蓓. CAD/CAM全程手术导板结合改良根盾技术在前牙区即刻种植中的应用[J]. 口腔材料器械杂志, 2021, 30(1): 55-60.
Shi JY, Lai YR, Wang B.Application of the fully-guided implant surgical template with CAD/CAM technology and modified socket shield technique for immediate implant placement of anterior teeth[J]. Chinese Journal of Dental Materials and Devices, 2021, 30(1): 55-60.
[4] Wismeijer D, Joda T, Flügge T, et al.Group 5 ITI consensus report: digital technologies[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018, 29(Suppl 16): 436-442.
[5] Hultin M, Svensson KG, Trulsson M.Clinical advantages of computer-guided implant placement: a systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(Suppl 6): 124-135.
[6] 范亚伟, 孙福星, 张鹏飞. 数字化技术在口腔上前牙区种植修复中的临床研究[J]. 山西医科大学学报, 2018, 49(7): 870-873.
Fan YW, Sun FX, Zhang PF.Clinical research of digital design in implant rehabilitation of oral maxillary anterior teeth area[J]. Journal of Shanxi Medical University, 2018, 49(7): 870-873.
[7] Spies BC, Fross A, Adolfsson E, et al.Stability and aging resistance of a zirconia oral implant using a carbon fiberreinforced screw for implant-abutment connection[J]. Dent Mater, 2018, 34(10): 1585-1595.
[8] Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Boumans T, et al.A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015, 17(2): 343-352.
[9] Sun Y, Luebbers HT, Agbaje JO, et al.Accuracy of a dedicated bone-supported surgical template for dental implant placement with direct visual control[J]. J Healthc Eng, 2015, 6(4): 779-789.
[10] Kauffmann P, Rau A, Engelke W, et al.Accuracy of navigation-guided dental implant placement with screw versus hand template fixation in the edentulous mandible[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2018, 33(2): 383-388.
[11] 邵琴, 杨国利. 全程导航与部分导航的数字化种植导板的对比分析[J].口腔医学, 2020, 40(3): 285-288.
Shao Q, Yang GL.Comparative analysis of fully-navigated and partial navigated digital implanted guides[J]. Stomatology, 2020, 40(3): 285-288.
[12] Gargallo-Albiol J, Barootchi S, Marqués-Guasch J, et al.Fully guided versus half-guided and freehand implant placement: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2020, 35(6): 1159-1169.
[13] 宿玉成. 口腔种植学[M].第2版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2014:435.
Su YC.Oral implantology[M]. 2rd Ed. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2014:435.
[14] 李琳, 苏莹, 张忠提. 牙种植数字化导板及其精确性影响因素研究进展[J].中国实用口腔科杂志, 2019, 12(3): 182-186.
Li L, Su Y, Zhang ZT.Research progress of digital implant-guide plate and its influencing factors of accuracy[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Stomatology, 2019, 12(3): 182-186.
[15] Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Piskin B, et al.Conventional multislice computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) for computer-aided implant placement. Part Ⅱ: reliability of mucosasupported stereolithographic guides[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2013, 15(6): 907-917.
[16] Cristache CM, Gurbanescu S.Accuracy evaluation of a stereolithographic surgical template for dental implant insertion using 3D superimposition protocol[J]. Int J Dent, 2017, 2017: 4292081.
[17] Van Assche N, Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, et al.Accuracy of computer-aided implant placement[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(Suppl 6): 112-123.
[18] 涂业颖, 周健, 于艳春, 等. 国产六维导板辅助无牙颌种植手术的精度分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(5): 504-508.
Tu YY, Zhou J, Yu YC, et al.Accuracy of 6D computed-derived implant guides made in China for dental implant surgery in edentulous patients[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2020, 29(5): 504-508.
[19] Rungcharassaeng K, Caruso JM, Kan JY, et al.Accuracy of computer-guided surgery: a comparison of operator experience[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015, 114(3): 407-413.
[20] Kivovics M, Pénzes D, Németh O, et al.The influence of surgical experience and bone density on the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery in edentulous jaws using a mucosa-supported surgical template with a half-guided implant placement protocol-a randomized clinical study[J]. Materials(Basel), 2020, 13(24): 5759-5771.
[21] Schimmel M, Akino N, Srinivasan M, et al.Accuracy of intraoral scanning in completely and partially edentulous maxillary and mandibular jaws: an in vitro analysis[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2021, 25(4): 1839-1847.
[22] Gargallo-Albiol J, Barootchi S, Marqués-Guasch J, et al.Fully guided versus half-guided and freehand implant placement: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2020, 35(6): 1159-1169.

2种CAD/CAM口腔数字化导板精度的比较

Comparative study on accuracy of 2 kinds of CAD/CAM dental digital guide plates in dental implantation

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李永清, 张赟, 惠铄壹, 惠小勇, 许广杰, 杨霞, 肖伯承, 侯锐. 3种不同材料三维模型牙临床应用特点比较[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2024, 22(3): 239-244.
[2]	魏洪波, 周铭浩, 李德华. 种植导航虚拟教学系统在本科教学中的应用效果评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(5): 502-505.
[3]	曾令紫, 莫安春. 富血小板纤维蛋白在口腔种植中的应用进展[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(5): 518-521.
[4]	孙守福, 张莹, 赵昊明, 王文超, 魏文佳, 郭克. 数字化导板辅助下左上根折中切牙不翻瓣即刻种植即刻自体冠修复1例报告[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(2): 197-202.
[5]	金夏悦, 顾迎新. 骨质疏松对口腔种植修复影响的研究进展[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(1): 81-86.
[6]	朱青青, 孙强, 王冬玲, 周弘. 红茴香注射液用于缓解种植术后不良反应的效果评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(3): 230-234.
[7]	武玉鹏, 梅东梅, 张琦, 王文雪, 赵保东. 国产数字化动态导航和数字化静态导板在口腔种植手术中的精准度及手术时长分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2021, 19(2): 151-155.
[8]	魏洪波, 王新革, 李德华. 手术直播在口腔种植本科教学中的应用效果评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(5): 465-468.
[9]	张翌婕, 史俊宇, 赖红昌. 数字化印模在口腔种植修复中的研究进展[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(5): 469-473.
[10]	阮丹平, 杨奕辰, 邓思楠, 赵怨怨, 吴春云. 2型糖尿病患者术前预防性应用抗生素对口腔种植疗效的影响：3~5年回顾性研究[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(3): 231-235.
[11]	王文雪, 姜帅, 梅东梅, 李晓静, 姚晨阳, 王大山, 赵保东. 3D打印导板在上前牙种植中的精度评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(2): 127-131.
[12]	沈宇清, 刘文娟, 孙健, 余优成, 周倩蓉, 徐艺. 不同分割阈值重建锥形束CT数字化牙模型的精度研究[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2019, 17(3): 221-224.
[13]	徐逢源, 周琳怡, 顾迎新. 3种含漱液在口腔种植术后维护口腔卫生中的效果比较[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2019, 17(1): 53-57.
[14]	李晨琳, 徐光宙. 口腔种植中骨增量技术的应用进展[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2018, 16(6): 553-558.
[15]	郭鹏女, 郭华艳, 钟华星, 黄兰, 陈卫东, 张迎娣, 黄远亮. 个别正常▌成人上前牙美学区唇、腭侧骨板厚度测量分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2016, 14(4): 337-343.