家族性巨大型牙骨质瘤家系致病基因新发突变和临床表型分析

doi:10.19438/j.cjoms.2022.04.008

中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (4): 360-365.doi: 10.19438/j.cjoms.2022.04.008

家族性巨大型牙骨质瘤家系致病基因新发突变和临床表型分析

李欣, 王周阳, 秦兴军

上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院口腔颌面-头颈肿瘤科,上海交通大学口腔医学院, 国家口腔医学中心,国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,上海市口腔医学重点实验室,上海 200011

收稿日期:2021-11-29 修回日期:2022-02-28 出版日期:2022-07-20 发布日期:2022-07-20
通讯作者: 秦兴军,E-mail: qinxj1989@sina.com
作者简介:李欣（1995-）,女,硕士,E-mail: zyrlkj@live.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（82071099）; 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院交叉基金（JYJC202007）; 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院罕见病专项基金（JYHJB01）

Identification of a de novo mutation in ANO5 by whole exome sequencing and clinical phenotype of familial gigantiform cementoma

LI Xin, WANG Zhou-yang, QIN Xing-jun

Department of Oromaxillofacial Head and Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011, China

Received:2021-11-29 Revised:2022-02-28 Online:2022-07-20 Published:2022-07-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 应用全外显子测序技术对家族性巨大型牙骨质瘤（familial gigantiform cementoma, FGC）家系进行测序,筛选致病基因及突变,并探讨基因型与临床表型的关系。方法: 纳入以颌骨畸形、下肢长骨骨折为主要表现的1个FGC家系9例患者, 评估患者临床表现、骨影像学、骨密度、骨转换相关生化等指标。提取9例患者及家系中14名未患病者外周血基因组DNA,进行全基因组外显子捕获及高通量测序,通过生物信息学分析、确定突变位点,利用Sanger测序法对384名未患FGC且无此疾病家族史的受试者进行验证。结果: FGC主要表型为上、下颌骨 4 个象限内均存在弥漫性多发病灶,以下颌骨体前部尤为严重,颌骨畸形明显;并伴有全身骨密度下降,常因轻微外力导致多次下肢长骨骨折。全外显子测序发现,所有患者均存在ANO5（c.1538C> T, p.Thr513Ile）杂合突变,该突变影响ANO5蛋白功能与结构。结论: FGC是罕见的常染色体显性遗传疾病,中国FGC患者以颌骨畸形、下肢长骨骨折、骨密度降低为主要表型。ANO5基因突变是目前唯一致病基因, 扩展了对FGC表型和致病基因突变型的认识。

关键词: 家族性巨大型牙骨质瘤, ANO5基因, 遗传突变, 表型, 基因型

Abstract: PURPOSE: To develop an approach based on whole exome sequencing (WES) to explore the correlation between genotype and clinical phenotype of a Chinese familial gigantiform cementoma (FGC) family caused by a mutation in ANO5 gene. METHODS: Nine patients from a Chinese FGC family with facial deformities and lower limb fractures were included. The clinical manifestations, skeletal radiographic features, bone mineral density (BMD), and bone turnover biomarkers were investigated. Peripheral blood from 9 patients and 14 controls within the family was collected, and WES was performed. By using filtering strategy, the candidate genes were sequenced and further validated by PCR and Sanger sequencing in the unaffected individuals within the family and 384 healthy control subjects. RESULTS: The major manifestations of Chinese FGC patients were representative multiquadrant and expansive deformities involving the mandible and maxilla, especially severe in the anterior mandible with diffuse osteopenia bone loss and several fractures in the lower limbs. Sequencing results showed that there was a missense, heterozygous mutation in ANO5 (c.1538C>T, p.Thr513Ile) in all affected individuals, that affected the folding, structure and function of ANO5. CONCLUSIONS: FGC is a rare autosomal dominant hereditary disease caused by ANO5 mutations, with severe facial deformity, long bone fractures and low BMD as main characteristics of Chinese' patients. The first and a novel missense mutation of ANO5 was identified, which extended the phenotypic and genetic spectrum of FGC.

Key words: Familial gigantiform cementoma, ANO5 gene, Novel mutation, Phenotype, Genotype

中图分类号:

R739.8

李欣, 王周阳, 秦兴军. 家族性巨大型牙骨质瘤家系致病基因新发突变和临床表型分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(4): 360-365.

LI Xin, WANG Zhou-yang, QIN Xing-jun. Identification of a de novo mutation in ANO5 by whole exome sequencing and clinical phenotype of familial gigantiform cementoma[J]. China J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2022, 20(4): 360-365.

参考文献

[1] Moshref M, Khojasteh A, Kazemi B, et al.Autosomal dominant gigantiform cementoma associated with bone fractures[J]. Am J Med Genet A, 2008, 146A(5): 644-648.
[2] Agazzi C, Belloni L.Hard odontomas of the jaws. Clinico-roentgenologic and anatomo-microscopic contribution with special reference to widely extensive forms with familial occurrence[J]. Arch Ital Otol Rinol Laringol, 1953, 64(Suppl 16): 1-103.
[3] Wang HW, Yu M, Qin XJ, et al.Familial gigantiform cementoma: distinctive clinical features of a large Chinese pedigree[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2015, 53(1): 83-85.
[4] Finical SJ, Kane WJ, Clay RP, et al.Familial gigantiform cementoma[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1999, 103(3): 949-954.
[5] Rossbach HC, Letson D, Lacson A, et al.Familial gigantiform cementoma with brittle bone disease, pathologic fractures, and osteosarcoma: a possible explanation of an ancient mystery[J]. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2005, 44(4): 390-396.
[6] Wang HW, Ma CY, Qin XJ, et al.Management strategy in patient with familial gigantiform cementoma: a case report and analysis of the literature[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, 96(50): e9138.
[7] Hicks D, Sarkozy A, Muelas N, et al.A founder mutation in Anoctamin 5 is a major cause of limb-girdle muscular dystrophy[J]. Brain, 2011, 134(Pt 1): 171-182.
[8] Bolduc V, Marlow G, Boycott KM, et al.Recessive mutations in the putative calcium-activated chloride channel anoctamin 5 cause proximal LGMD2L and distal MMD3 muscular dystrophies[J]. Am J Hum Genetics, 2010, 86(2): 213-221.
[9] Penttilä S, Palmio J, Suominen T, et al.Eight new mutations and the expanding phenotype variability in muscular dystrophy caused by ANO5[J]. Neurology, 2012, 78(12): 897-903.
[10] Wang X, Liu X, Dong R, et al.Genetic disruption of anoctamin 5 in mice replicates human gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia (GDD)[J]. Calcified Tissue Int, 2019, 104(6): 679-689.
[11] Rolvien T, Avci O, von Kroge S, et al. Gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia is not recapitulated in a respective mouse model carrying a mutation of the Ano5 gene[J]. Bone Rep, 2020, 12: 100281.
[12] Pedemonte N, Galietta LJV.Structure and function of TMEM16 proteins (anoctamins)[J]. Physiol Rev, 2014, 94(2): 419-459.
[13] Dang S, Feng S, Tien J, et al.Cryo-EM structures of the TMEM16A calcium-activated chloride channel[J]. Nature, 2017, 552(7685): 426-429.
[14] Paulino C, Kalienkova V, Lam AKM, et al.Activation mechanism of the calcium-activated chloride channel TMEM16A revealed by cryo-EM[J]. Nature, 2017, 552(7685): 421-425.
[15] Brunner JD, Lim NK, Schenck S, et al.X-ray structure of a calcium-activated TMEM16 lipid scramblase[J]. Nature, 2014, 516(7530): 207-212.
[16] Marconi C, Binello PB, Badiali G, et al.A novel missense mutation in ANO5/TMEM16E is causative for gnathodiaphyseal dyplasia in a large Italian pedigree[J]. Eur J Hum Genet, 2013, 21(6): 613-619.
[17] Andreeva TV, Tyazhelova TV, Rykalina VN, et al.Whole exome sequencing links dental tumor to an autosomal-dominant mutation in ANO5 gene associated with gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia and muscle dystrophies[J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 26440.
[18] Tsutsumi S, Kamata N, Vokes TJ, et al.The novel gene encoding a putative transmembrane protein is mutated in gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia (GDD)[J]. Am J Hum Genetics, 2004, 74(6): 1255-1261.
[19] Jin L, Liu Y, Sun F, et al.Three novel ANO5 missense mutations in Caucasian and Chinese families and sporadic cases with gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 40935.
[20] Otaify GA, Whyte MP, Gottesman GS, et al.Gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia: severe atypical presentation with novel heterozygous mutation of the anoctamin gene(ANO5)[J]. Bone, 2018, 107: 161-171.

家族性巨大型牙骨质瘤家系致病基因新发突变和临床表型分析

Identification of a de novo mutation in ANO5 by whole exome sequencing and clinical phenotype of familial gigantiform cementoma

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王周阳, 凌霄, 施燕妮, 王磊, 秦兴军. ANO5非移码插入突变型GDD家系临床分析及其诱导多能干细胞的构建[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2024, 22(1): 16-22.
[2]	王周阳，凌霄，施燕妮，王磊，秦兴军. ANO5非移码插入突变型GDD家系临床分析及其诱导多能干细胞的构建[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2024, 22(1): 36-41.
[3]	顾达, 霍然, 徐广琪, 毕见海, 李尚滨. 局部外用β受体阻滞剂治疗婴幼儿血管瘤的临床应用研究进展[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(4): 375-380.
[4]	周恒花, 汪洋, 李江, 田臻, 鲍泳扬, 王渊, 朱延波, 陈颖. 15例头颈部梭形细胞/硬化性横纹肌肉瘤的临床病理分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2019, 17(2): 181-185.
[5]	王宏伟，马春跃，贺光，徐立群，张陈平，秦兴军. 家族性巨大型牙骨质瘤患者下颌骨重建术式的选择:2例报告及文献复习[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2016, 14(1): 89-92.
[6]	王宏伟，杨嵘，贺光，张陈平，秦兴军. 家族性巨大型牙骨质瘤患者各时期临床特点分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2015, 13(6): 534-538.
[7]	王宏伟, 于淼, 秦兴军, 王丽珍, 徐立群, 张陈平. 家族性巨大型牙骨质瘤家系临床分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2014, 12(4): 360-364.