69例中老年人群切牙管形态学特征的CBCT测量分析

doi:10.19438/j.cjoms.2024.04.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 使用CBCT对中老年人群切牙管的相关形态学参数进行测量,分析切牙管位置与形态的增龄性变化,探讨切牙管与周围解剖结构之间的相对位置关系,为该人群的前牙种植美学修复设计提供参考。方法: 对69例50岁以上患者的CBCT资料进行测量,项目包括冠状面上位于切牙管切牙孔(W_IF)、中位(W_m)和斯坦森孔(W_SF)处的切牙管宽度,矢状面切牙管长轴上的切牙孔(D_IF)、中位(D_m)和斯坦森孔(D_SF)处的切牙管直径,唇侧的骨最凹处到切牙管前壁的距离(A),以及牙槽嵴顶到A处的距离(B)。根据患者性别、是否缺失上前牙进行分组,采用SPSS 19.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果: 切牙管平均宽度(W)为（3.93±0.83）mm,平均直径(D)为（3.03±0.83）mm;唇侧骨最凹处到切牙管前壁的距离（A）平均为（6.15±1.53）mm,牙槽嵴顶到A处的距离（B）平均为（11.98±2.50）mm。男性组的D_IF[(3.61±0.79) mm]高于女性组[(3.14±0.94)mm],男性组的D_SF[(2.96±1.22)mm]高于女性组[(2.31±0.92)mm],男性组的A值[(6.76±1.43)mm]高于女性组[(5.48±1.36)mm],牙缺失组的A值[(5.73±1.55)mm]低于无牙缺失组[(6.41±1.48)mm],牙缺失组的B值[(10.73±2.64)mm]低于无牙缺失组[(12.78±2.06)mm],差异均具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论: 性别对切牙管的直径、牙槽嵴厚度有影响,上前牙是否缺失对牙槽嵴高度有影响。在中老年前牙缺失患者中,需要更精确地控制种植方向与深度。

关键词: 切牙管, CBCT, 牙种植, 牙槽嵴厚度, 牙槽嵴高度

Abstract: PURPOSE: To measure the morphological parameters of the incisive canals in the middle-aged and elderly population using CBCT, to analyze the age-related changes in the position and morphology of the incisive canals, and to investigate the relative position between the incisive canals and the surrounding anatomical structures, in order to provide reference for the design of aesthetic anterior dental implant restorations in this population. METHODS: CBCT data from 69 patients over 50 years of age were measured in the sagittal and coronal planes for the incisal foramen(W_IF) along the long axis of the incisal canal, the width of the incisal canal from the median (W_m) to the Stetson's foramen (W_SF), the diameter of the incisal canal along the long axis of the incisal canal(D_IF), the diameter of the incisal canal from the median (D_m) to the Stetson's foramen(D_SF), and the distance from the most concave part of the bone on the labial side to the anterior wall of the incisal canal (A), and the distance from the top of the alveolar ridge to A (B) were measured, respectively. The patients were grouped according to gender and whether or not they were missing upper anterior teeth, and the data were analyzed using SPSS 19.0 software package. RESULTS: The mean width of the incisal canal(W) was (3.93±0.83) mm, the mean diameter(D) was (3.03±0.83) mm, the mean distance from the most concave part of the bone on the labial side to the anterior wall of the incisal canal was (6.15±1.53) mm, and the mean distance from the top of the alveolar ridge to A was (11.98±2.50) mm. D_IF in male group [(3.61 ± 0.79) mm] was higher than that in female group[(3.14±0.94) mm], D_SF in male group [(2.96±1.22) mm] was higher than that in female group[(2.31±0.92) mm], A value in male group [(6.76±1.43) mm] was higher than that in female group [(5.48±1.36) mm], A value in the edentulous group [(5.73±1.55) mm] was lower than that in the edentulous group [(6.41±1.48)mm], B value in the edentulous group[(10.73±2.64)mm] was lower than that in the edentulous group [(12.78±2.06)mm]. All the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Gender has an influence on the diameter of the incisal canal, the thickness of the alveolar crest bone. The height of the alveolar crest was related to with or without missing upper anterior teeth; and in middle-aged and elderly patients with missing anterior teeth, a more precise control of the implant direction at depth is needed.

Key words: Nasopalatine canal, CBCT, Dental implant, Thickness of the alveolar crest bone, Height of the alveolar crest

中图分类号:

R782.1

王敬夫, 张宁, 杨勇, 张巍瀚, 常欣. 69例中老年人群切牙管形态学特征的CBCT测量分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2024, 22(4): 385-389.

WANG Jing-fu, ZHANG Ning, YANG Yong, ZHANG Wei-han, CHANG Xin. Measurements of morphological characteristics of incisal canals in 65 middle-aged and elderly patients by CBCT[J]. China J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2024, 22(4): 385-389.

参考文献

[1] Mardinger O, Namani-Sadan N, Chaushu G, et al.Morphologic changes of the nasopalatine canal related to dental implantation: a radiologic study in different degrees of absorbed maxillae[J]. J Periodontol, 2008, 79(9):1659-1662.
[2] Costa EDD, Nejaim Y, Martins LAC, et al.Morphological evaluation of the nasopalatine canal in patients with different facial profiles and ages[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2019, 77(4): 721-729.
[3] Bahsi I, Orhan M, Kervancioglu P, et al.Anatomical evaluation of nasopalatine canal on cone beam computed tomography images[J]. Folia Morphol (Warsz), 2019, 78(1): 153-162.
[4] 王敬夫, 刘传宏, 常欣, 等. 锥形束CT下下颌第三磨牙分类与下颌神经管分支类型关系分析[J].临床军医杂志, 2022, 50(6): 630-632, 635.
Wang JF, Liu CH, Chang X, et al.Analysis of the relationship between mandibular third molar classification and mandibular neural tube branch type under conical beam CT[J]. Journal of Clinical Military Medicine, 2022, 50(6): 630-632,635.
[5] Panda M, Shankar T, Raut A, et al.Cone beam computerized tomography evaluation of incisive canal and anterior maxillary bone thickness for placement of immediate implants[J]. J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 2018, 18(4): 356-363.
[6] Hakbilen S, Magat G.Evaluation of anatomical and morphological characteristics of the nasopalatine canal in a Turkish population by cone beam computed tomography[J]. Folia Morphol (Warsz), 2018, 77(3): 527-535.
[7] Demiralp KÖ, Kursun-Çakmak ES, Bayrak S, et al. Evaluation of anatomical and volumetric characteristics of the nasopalatine canal in anterior dentate and edentulous individuals: a CBCT study[J]. Implant Dent, 2018, 27(4): 474-479.
[8] Singhal MK, Dandriyal R, Aggarwal A, et al.Implant placement into the nasopalatine foramen: considerations from anatomical and surgical point of view[J]. Ann Maxillofac Surg, 2018, 8(2): 347-351.
[9] 王智, 邹立东. 锥形束CT对切牙管及其相对位置关系的测量分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(6): 994-999.
Wang Z, Zou LD.Measurement and analysis of the nasopalatine canal and its relative position by conebeam computed tomography[J]. Journal of Peking University (Med), 2015, 47(6): 994-999.
[10] Liang X, Jacobs R, Martens W, et al.Macro-and micro-anatomical, histological and computed tomography scan characterization of the nasopalatine canal[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2015, 36(7): 598-603.
[11] Mraiwa N, Jacobs R, Van Cleynenbreugel J, et al.The nasopalatine canal revisited using 2D and 3D CT imaging[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2004, 33(6): 396-402.
[12] Fernández-Alonso A, Suárez-Quintanilla JA, Muinelo-Lorenzo J, et al.Three-dimensional study of nasopalatine canal morphology: a descriptive retrospective analysis using cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 2014, 36(9): 895-905.
[13] Tözüm TF, Güncü GN, Yildirim YD, et al.Evaluation of maxillary incisive canal characteristics related to dental implant treatment with computerized tomography: a clinical multicenter study[J]. J Periodontol, 2012, 83(3): 337-343.
[14] Peñarrocha D, Candel E, Guirado JL, et al.Implants placed in the nasopalatine canal to rehabilitate severely atrophic maxillae: a retrospective study with long follow-up[J]. J Oral Implantol, 2014, 40(6): 699-706.
[15] Güncü GN, Yildirim YD, Yilmaz HG, et al.Is there a gender difference in anatomic features of incisive canal and maxillary environmental bone?[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2013, 24(9): 1023-1026.