种植联合血管化髂骨移植重建14例下颌骨缺损的长期疗效观察

doi:10.19438/j.cjoms.2022.05.013

中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (5): 488-493.doi: 10.19438/j.cjoms.2022.05.013

种植联合血管化髂骨移植重建14例下颌骨缺损的长期疗效观察

顾雨薇¹, 王凤², 黄伟², 张志勇³, 张陈平⁴, 孙坚⁴, 吴轶群¹

1.上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院口腔第二门诊,2.口腔种植科,3.口腔特需科,4.口腔颌面-头颈肿瘤科,上海交通大学口腔医学院,国家口腔医学中心,国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,上海市口腔医学重点实验室,上海 200011

收稿日期:2022-02-23 修回日期:2022-03-28 出版日期:2022-09-20 发布日期:2022-09-20
通讯作者: 吴轶群,E-mail：yiqunwu@hotmail.com
作者简介:顾雨薇（1995-）,女,硕士研究生,E-mail：yuweigu_9hospital@foxmail.com
基金资助:
中国医学科学院医学与健康科技创新工程项目资助（2019-I2M-5-037）; 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院口腔医学研究型学科基金（KQYJXK2020）

Long-term performance of dental implants in vascularized iliac crest grafts for mandibular reconstruction in 14 consecutive patients

GU Yu-wei¹, WANG Feng², HUANG Wei², ZHANG Zhi-yong³, ZHANG Chen-ping⁴, SUN Jian⁴, WU Yi-qun¹

1. Department of Second Dental Center, 2. Department of Oral Implantology, 3. Department of Oral Special Consultation, 4. Department of Oromaxillofacial Head and Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011, China

Received:2022-02-23 Revised:2022-03-28 Online:2022-09-20 Published:2022-09-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 通过临床及影像学方法,评估种植联合血管化髂骨移植重建下颌骨缺损的长期疗效。方法: 对上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院1995—2005年收治的14例患者47颗植入血管化髂骨的种植体进行随访,其中10例30颗种植体为下颌骨血管化髂骨重建术中同期植入,4例17颗种植体为术后二期植入,上部结构均采用种植支持式固定义齿修复。评估分析种植体15年累积生存率及修复体生存率,修复完成后5年及10年分别进行临床评价。采用SPSS 26.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果: 种植体均未发生愈合期内失败。种植体10年、15年累积生存率分别为90.44%和86.67%,修复体15年累积生存率为78.32%。种植体5年及10年边缘骨吸收分别为（2.08±0.27）mm和（4.22±0.48）mm,两者有显著差异（P<0.0001）。生物学并发症主要为种植体周围炎及软组织增生,机械并发症主要为修复体磨耗。结论: 种植联合血管化髂骨移植重建下颌骨缺损的长期疗效较为稳定,是下颌骨缺损重建的有效方法;但种植体周围炎发生率较高,维护种植体周围软、硬组织的稳定是种植体远期疗效的重要保证。

关键词: 血管化髂骨, 种植体, 下颌骨缺损, 生存分析

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term performance of dental implants installed in vascularized iliac crest grafts for mandibular reconstruction by clinical and radiographic examinations. METHODS: From 1995 to 2005, 47 implants installed in vascularized iliac crest grafts for mandibular reconstruction in 14 patients were analyzed, including 30 implants immediately placed into vascularized iliac crest grafts in 10 patients and 17 implants placed later in 4 patients. The cumulative survival rate within 15 years of dental implants and prostheses was evaluated. Clinical assessments and radiographic examination were performed 5 years and 10 years after implant loading. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0 software package. RESULTS: No early failures occurred during the healing period. Cumulative survival rates of implants for 10 years and 15 years were 90.44% and 86.67% and cumulative survival rate of prostheses for 15 years was 78.32%, respectively. The average marginal bone loss at 5 years was (2.08±0.27) mm, while that at 10 years was (4.22±0.48) mm (P<0.0001). Biological complications were peri-implantitis and soft tissue hyperplasia, and mechanical complication was abrasion of the prostheses mainly. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term performance of dental implants installed in vascularized iliac crest grafts for mandibular reconstruction is stable, which is an effective method for mandibular defect reconstruction, but the incidence of peri-implantitis is relatively higher. So, maintaining the stability of soft and hard tissues around the implant is a crucial guarantee for the long-term performance of implants.

Key words: Vascularized iliac crest grafts, Dental implants, Mandibular defect, Survival analysis

中图分类号:

R783.4

顾雨薇, 王凤, 黄伟, 张志勇, 张陈平, 孙坚, 吴轶群. 种植联合血管化髂骨移植重建14例下颌骨缺损的长期疗效观察[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(5): 488-493.

GU Yu-wei, WANG Feng, HUANG Wei, ZHANG Zhi-yong, ZHANG Chen-ping, SUN Jian, WU Yi-qun. Long-term performance of dental implants in vascularized iliac crest grafts for mandibular reconstruction in 14 consecutive patients[J]. China J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2022, 20(5): 488-493.

参考文献

[1] 张陈平. 下颌骨重建术[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2005,15(3):215-218.
Zhang CP.Mandibular reconstruction[J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg,2005,15(3):215-218.
[2] Strauch B, Bloomberg AE, Lewin ML.An experimental approach to mandibular replacement: island vascular composite rib grafts[J]. Br J Plast Surg, 1971, 24(4): 334-341.
[3] Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, et al.The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1986, 1(1): 11-25.
[4] Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland T, et al.Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs[J]. J Biomed Mater Res, 1999, 45(2): 75-83.
[5] Lindquist E, Karlsson S.Success rate and failures for fixed partial dentures after 20 years of service: part I[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 1998, 11(2): 133-138.
[6] Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Lang NP, et al.A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2004, 15(6): 667-776.
[7] 张志勇,邱蔚六,黄伟.髂骨移植与种植体的临床研究[J].中国口腔种植学杂志,1999,4(1):34-36, 45.
Zhang ZY, Qiou WL, Huang W.Clinic study on iliac bone graft combined with osseointegrated implants for the treatment of mandibular defect[J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology,1999,4(1): 34-36, 45.
[8] Khadembaschi D, Brierly GI, Chatfield MD, et al.Systematic review and pooled analysis of survival rates, success, and outcomes of osseointegrated implants in a variety of composite free flaps[J]. Head Neck, 2020, 42(9): 2669-2686.
[9] 吴轶群, 张志勇, 张志愿, 等. ITI种植体即刻植入血管化髂骨修复下颌骨缺损12例分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2005, 14(2): 103-107.
Wu YQ, Zhang ZY, Zhang ZY, et al.ITI dental implants immediately placed into vascularized iliac bone grafts for reconstruction of mandibular defect: analysis of 12 consecutive cases[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2005,14(2): 103-107.
[10] Chrcanovic BR, Kisch J, Albrektsson T, et al.A retrospective study on clinical and radiological outcomes of oral implants in patients followed up for a minimum of 20 years[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2018, 20(2): 199-207.
[11] Chang YM, Wallace CG, Tsai CY, et al.Dental implant outcome after primary implantation into double-barreled fibula osteoseptocutaneous free flap-reconstructed mandible[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2011, 128(6): 1220-1228.
[12] Mertens C, Freudlsperger C, Bodem J, et al.Reconstruction of the maxilla following hemimaxillectomy defects with scapular tip grafts and dental implants[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2016, 44(11): 1806-1811.
[13] Raoul G, Ruhin B, Briki S, et al.Microsurgical reconstruction of the jaw with fibular grafts and implants[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2009, 20(6): 2105-2117.
[14] Shaw RJ, Sutton AF, Cawood JI, et al.Oral rehabilitation after treatment for head and neck malignancy[J]. Head Neck, 2005, 27(6): 459-470.
[15] Shen YF, Rodriguez ED, Wei FC, et al.Aesthetic and functional mandibular reconstruction with immediate dental implants in a free fibular flap and a low-profile reconstruction plate: five-year follow-up[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2015, 74(4): 442-446.
[16] Hakim SG, Kimmerle H, Trenkle T, et al.Masticatory rehabilitation following upper and lower jaw reconstruction using vascularised free fibula flap and enossal implants-19 years of experience with a comprehensive concept[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2015, 19(2): 525-534.
[17] Teoh KH, Huryn JM, Patel S, et al.Implant prosthodontic rehabilitation of fibula free-flap reconstructed mandibles: a Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center review of prognostic factors and implant outcomes[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,2005,20(5):738-746.
[18] Okay DJ, Buchbinder D, Urken M, et al.Computer-assisted implant rehabilitation of maxillomandibular defects reconstructed with vascularized bone free flaps[J]. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2013,139(4): 371-381.
[19] Qu X, Zhang C, Yang W, et al.Deep circumflex iliac artery flap with osseointegrated implants for reconstruction of mandibular benign lesions: clinical experience of 33 cases[J]. Ir J Med Sci,2013,182(3): 493-498.
[20] Ferrari S, Copelli C, Bianchi B, et al.Rehabilitation with endosseous implants in fibula free-flap mandibular reconstruction: a case series of up to 10 years[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg,2013,41(2): 172-178.
[21] Boynuegri D, Nemli SK, Kasko YA.Significance of keratinized mucosa around dental implants: a prospective comparative study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2013, 24(8): 928-933.

种植联合血管化髂骨移植重建14例下颌骨缺损的长期疗效观察

Long-term performance of dental implants in vascularized iliac crest grafts for mandibular reconstruction in 14 consecutive patients

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	古丽斯旦·麦吾拉江, 李晨曦, 龚忠诚, 热依拉·居热提, 姬晓炜. 口腔种植体周围菌群对种植体周围炎影响的meta分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2024, 22(5): 478-486.
[2]	孙思敏, 张森林. 动态导航引导下下颌骨缺损腓骨瓣移植修复区种植体植入1例报告[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2024, 22(5): 513-517.
[3]	裘实, 罗畅, 蔡安庆, 王小菲, 朱挺. 个性化牙龈成型器在不同牙龈生物型及角化龈宽度患者上颌单颗前牙种植中的应用效果[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2024, 22(4): 378-384.
[4]	杨伟华, 姜晟波, 周莺莺. 微创种植牙在牙列游离端缺失患者中的应用效果评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2024, 22(4): 390-393.
[5]	孟宇翔, 宋凯, 何宗轩, 王琳, 葛胜优, 魏晨珂, 尚伟. 微血管吻合器在股前外侧皮瓣修复口腔恶性肿瘤术后缺损中的应用效果[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2024, 22(3): 268-273.
[6]	李锦存, 翟堃, 胡晨, 刘絮影, 马兴平, 马坚. 整合WGNCA和PPI网络鉴定口腔鳞状细胞癌的关键基因[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2024, 22(2): 128-136.
[7]	张冰清, 史敬存, 吴梓谦, 张于涵, 王婕妤, 肖孟, 王磊. 同期神经化腓骨瓣用于下颌骨重建及下唇感觉恢复的术式初探[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2024, 22(2): 143-147.
[8]	潘旭祯, 王煜君. 3种咬合纸在人工种植牙修复中的应用效果比较[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2024, 22(1): 63-67.
[9]	曹旻, 徐旭. 体外冲击波治疗种植体周围炎的研究进展[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(6): 610-614.
[10]	兰嵘, 阮敏, 韩楠男, 王凤. 左下种植修复后发生植体周围鳞状细胞癌1例报告[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(2): 203-205.
[11]	宋昊天, 洪多, 瞿晓辉. 末端游离单颗种植体远期骨吸收量回顾性分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(1): 55-58.
[12]	胡颖恺, 邹多宏, 杨驰. 超声骨刀分段截骨结合软组织增量治疗下前牙错位种植体1例报告[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(6): 612-617.
[13]	顾雨薇, 王凤, 黄伟, 张志勇, 张陈平, 孙坚, 吴轶群. 种植联合血管化髂骨移植重建14例下颌骨缺损的长期疗效观察[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(5): 422-428.
[14]	薛秋波, 薛陆峰, 马成, 丁皓月. 口腔种植体周围炎患者牙龈中组织蛋白酶B及Beclin-1的表达及临床意义[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(3): 251-256.
[15]	马捷, 王齐帅, 张兵华, 陈天天, 蔡国平, 宋涛. 口腔种植体-基台微间隙充填对种植修复系统及周围骨力学的影响[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(2): 117-122.