65例儿童髁突囊内骨折保守治疗临床预后的Helkimo指数评价

doi:10.19438/j.cjoms.2020.05.008

中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (5): 421-426.doi: 10.19438/j.cjoms.2020.05.008

65例儿童髁突囊内骨折保守治疗临床预后的Helkimo指数评价

杜常欣, 徐兵^*, 朱妍菲, 王雪纯, 吴艳棋, 朱敏^*

上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院·口腔医学院口腔颅颌面科,国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,上海市口腔医学重点实验室,上海市口腔医学研究所,上海 200011

收稿日期:2020-01-31 修回日期:2020-04-15 出版日期:2020-09-20 发布日期:2020-10-28
通讯作者: 朱敏,E-mail:zminnie@126.com;徐兵,E-mail:bingxu568@hotmail.com。^*共同通信作者
作者简介:杜常欣（1995-）,女,在读硕士研究生, E-mail：382507281@qq.com
基金资助:
上海市科学技术委员会研究项目（17411964100）

Evaluation of clinical prognosis of condylar intracapsular fractures in 65 children with conservative treatment using Helkimo index

DU Chang-xin, XU Bing, ZHU Yan-fei, WANG Xue-chun, WU Yan-qi, ZHU Min

Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011, China;

Received:2020-01-31 Revised:2020-04-15 Online:2020-09-20 Published:2020-10-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：应用Helkimo指数对行保守治疗的儿童髁突囊内骨折病例的临床预后进行回顾分析,探讨年龄、单侧或双侧骨折、骨折类型及治疗方法等因素对临床预后的影响。方法：对2009年8月—2019年8月65例（96侧）行保守治疗的儿童髁突囊内骨折患者的临床预后情况进行回顾,采用Helkimo指数（包括Ai指数和Di指数）作为评估工具,根据年龄、单侧或双侧骨折、骨折类型及保守治疗方法分亚组进行比较,采用SPSS 25.0软件包对数据进行非参数检验。结果：60例患者（92.31%）无明显主观症状（Ai 0和Ai I）,52例患者（80%）功能正常或有轻度功能障碍（Di 0和Di I）。不同年龄组间Ai指数的差异有统计学意义（P=0.001）;相比12~16岁组,0~5岁组（P<0.05）、6~11岁组（P<0.05）的Ai指数较小,主观临床预后更佳,但年龄对Di指数无显著影响（P=0.144）。单侧或双侧骨折（P=0.178）、不同骨折类型（P=0.139）、不同治疗方法（P=0.121）之间Ai指数无显著差异;单侧或双侧骨折（P=0.321）、不同骨折类型（P=0.692）、不同治疗方法（P=0.944）之间Di指数也无统计学差异。结论：儿童髁突囊内骨折经保守治疗的临床预后整体良好,主诉症状改善理想,部分患儿存在轻度功能障碍。

关键词: 髁突, 囊内骨折, 儿童, 保守治疗, Helkimo指数

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical prognosis of conservative treatment in children with condylar intracapsular fractures and explore different influencial factors including age, fracture type and treatment methods on the clinical prognosis. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in 65 children (96 sides) with condylar intracapsular fractures treated with conservative treatment from August 2009 to August 2019. The clinical prognosis assessed by Helkimo index (including Ai index and Di index) was analyzed, and compared respectively among different age group, fracture type and treatment methods. Non-parametric test was performed using SPSS 25.0 software package. RESULTS: Sixty patients (92.31%) had no obvious subjective symptoms (Ai 0 and Ai I), and 52 patients (80%) had normal clinical function or mild dysfunction (Di 0 and Di I). The differences in Ai levels between different age groups were statistically significant (P=0.001). Compared with 12-16 year old group, 0-5 year old group (P<0.05) and 6-11 year old group (P<0.05) both had better subjective clinical prognosis with smaller Ai index whereas age had no significant impact on Di index. There was no significant difference in Ai index between unilateral and bilateral fractures (P=0.178), different fracture types (P=0.139) and conservative treatment methods (P=0.121). Similarly, no significant difference was found in Di index between unilateral and bilateral fractures (P=0.321), different fracture types (P=0.692) and conservative treatment methods (P=0.944). CONCLUSIONS: Through conservative treatment, the clinical prognosis of condylar intracapsular fractures in children is proved to be good overall. The complaint of patients improves well though part of patients have mild dysfunction.

Key words: Condyle, intracapsular fracture, Children, Conservative treatment, Helkimo index

中图分类号:

R782.4

杜常欣, 徐兵, 朱妍菲, 王雪纯, 吴艳棋, 朱敏. 65例儿童髁突囊内骨折保守治疗临床预后的Helkimo指数评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(5): 421-426.

DU Chang-xin, XU Bing, ZHU Yan-fei, WANG Xue-chun, WU Yan-qi, ZHU Min. Evaluation of clinical prognosis of condylar intracapsular fractures in 65 children with conservative treatment using Helkimo index[J]. China J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2020, 18(5): 421-426.

参考文献

[1] Kao R, Rabbani CC, Patel JM,et al.Management of mandible fracture in 150 children across 7 years in a US tertiary care hospital[J]. JAMA Facial Plast Surg, 2019, 21(5):414-418.
[2] Lekven N, Neppelberg E, Tornes K.Long-term follow-up of mandibular condylar fractures in children[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011, 69(11): 2853-2859.
[3] Namdev R, Jindal A, Bhargava S, et al.Patterns of mandible fracture in children under 12 years in a district trauma center in India[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2016, 32(1): 32-36.
[4] Wheeler J, Phillips J.Pediatric facial fractures and potential long-term growth disturbances[J]. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr, 2011, 4(1): 43-52.
[5] Ghasemzadeh A, Mundinger GS, Swanson EW, et al.Treatment of pediatric condylar fractures:a 20-year experience[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2015,136(6):1279-1288.
[6] Ghosh R, Gopalkrishnan K, Anand J.Pediatric facial fractures:a 10-year study[J]. J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 2018, 17(2):158-163.
[7] He D, Ellis E 3rd, Zhang Y. Etiology of temporomandibular joint ankylosis secondary to condylar fractures:the role of concomitant mandibular fractures[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2008, 66(1): 77-84.
[8] Leuin SC, Frydendall E, Gao D, et al.Temporomandibular joint dysfunction after mandibular fracture in children:a 10-year review[J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2011,137(1): 10-14.
[9] McGoldrick DM, Parmar P, Williams R, et al. Management of pediatric condyle fractures[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2019,30(7): 2045-2047.
[10] Bruckmoser E, Undt G.Management and outcome of condylar fractures in children and adolescents:a review of the literature[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 2012,114(5 Suppl): S86-S106.
[11] Zhou HH, Han J, Li ZB.Conservative treatment of bilateral condylar fractures in children:case report and review of the literature[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2014,78(9): 1557-1562.
[12] Shi J, Chen Z, Xu B.Causes and treatment of mandibular and condylar fractures in children and adolescents:a review of 104 cases[J]. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2014, 140(3): 203-207.
[13] Neff A, Chossegros C, Blanc JL, et al.Position paper from the IBRA Symposium on Surgery of the Head-the 2nd International Symposium for Condylar Fracture Osteosynthesis, Marseille, France 2012[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2014,42(7):1234-1249.
[14] Kahl B, Fischbach R, Gerlach KL, et al.Temporomandibular joint morphology in children after treatment of condylar fractures with functional appliance therapy: a follow-up study us computed tomography[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 1995,24(1):37-45.
[15] Thoren H, Hallikainen D, Iizuka T, et al.Condylar process fractures in children:a follow-up study of fractures with total dislocation of the condyle from the glenoid fossa[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2001,59(7):768-773.
[16] Helkimo M.Studies on function and dysfunction of the masticatory system.Ⅱ. Index for anamnestic and clinical dysfunction and occlusal state[J]. Sven Tandlak Tidskr, 1974, 67(2): 101-121.
[17] Umstadt HE, Ellers M, Muller HH, et al.Functional reconstruction of the TM joint in cases of severely displaced fractures and fracture dislocation[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg,2000,28(2):97-105.
[18] 李新磊, 姚志涛, 王强, 等. 儿童髁突囊内骨折治疗方法选择的影响因素分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(3): 290-294
[19] Hlawitschka M, Eckelt U.Assessment of patients treated for intracapsular fractures of the mandibular condyle by closed techniques[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2002, 60(7): 784-791.
[20] 王生, 王光耀, 谷志远. Helkimo指数在颞下颌关节紊乱病研究中的应用[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2002, 3(2): 120-123.
[21] Defabianis P.Post-traumatic TMJ internal derangement: impact on facial growth (findings in a pediatric age group)[J]. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2003, 27(4): 297-303.
[22] Sahm G, Witt E.Long-term results after childhood condylar fractures. A computer-tomographic study[J]. Eur J Orthod, 1989, 11(2): 154-160.
[23] Theologie-Lygidakis N, Chatzidimitriou K, Tzerbos F, et al.Nonsurgical management of condylar fractures in children:A 15-year clinical retrospective study[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2016, 44(2): 85-93.
[24] 傅开元, 马旭臣, 张震康, 等. 颞下颌关节紊乱指数临床应用评价[J].中华口腔医学杂志, 2002, 37(5): 330-332.
[25] 邓雨萌,傅开元,刘亚萍,等.北京市207名3~5岁正常儿童开口度的调查报告[J].临床口腔医学杂志,1991,7(2): 119.
[26] Liu M, Zhao Y, He Y, et al.Outcomes of anterior disc displacement and condylar remodelling for sagittal fracture of the mandibular condyle in children after closed treatment[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2020, 49(1): 82-89
[27] Chrcanovic BR.Open versus closed reduction:mandibular condylar fractures in children[J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2012,16(3): 245-255.
[28] Norholt SE, Krishnan V, Sindet-Pedersen S, et al.Pediatric condylar fractures:a long-term follow-up study of 55 patients[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1993, 51(12): 1302-1310.
[29] Gilhuus-Moe O.Fractures of the mandibular condyle:a clinical and radiographic examination of 62 patients injured in the growth period[J]. Trans Int Conf Oral Surg, 1970, 121-130.
[30] Choi J, Oh N, Kim IK.A follow-up study of condyle fracture in children[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2005, 34(8): 851-858.
[31] Hovinga J, Boering G, Stegenga B.Long-term results of nonsurgical management of condylar fractures in children[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1999, 28(6):429-440.
[32] Tang Y, Wang X, Zhu Y, et al.A Comparative evaluation of CBCT outcomes of two closed treatment methods in intracapsular condylar fractures[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 2017,123(5): e141-e147.
[33] 吴杨,龙星,邓末宏,等.颌间牵引联合垫治疗儿童髁突骨折的疗效评估[J].中国修复重建外科杂志, 2015, 29(4): 397-401.
[34] Egermark I, Thilander B.Craniomandibular disorders with special reference to orthodontic treatment: an evaluation from childhood to adulthood[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1992,101(1): 28-34.

65例儿童髁突囊内骨折保守治疗临床预后的Helkimo指数评价

Evaluation of clinical prognosis of condylar intracapsular fractures in 65 children with conservative treatment using Helkimo index

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	郝亚楠, 石欢, 崔雅萍. 针对性护理用于儿童复发性腮腺炎的效果评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2024, 22(5): 455-458.
[2]	刘佳乐, 蔡蕾, 杨钰云, 张燕飞. 110例儿童牙外伤临床特征及发生牙髓坏死的相关因素探讨[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2024, 22(5): 468-472.
[3]	周循, 索璐璐, 刘锦星, 周徐慧, 仇琳, 李静洁, 郑永超, 劳蔚. 颌面部鲜红斑痣患儿光动力治疗苏醒期躁动的影响因素及药物干预措施的观察性研究[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2024, 22(3): 261-267.
[4]	王家慧, 段晓雯, 周徐慧, 仇琳, 李静洁, 蔡美华, 郑永超. 儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征全麻苏醒期躁动风险预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2024, 22(2): 175-180.
[5]	郑阳山, 袁学顺, 姜晶, 邱书奇, 石照辉. 儿童口呼吸诊断及对牙颌面发育的影响[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2024, 22(1): 92-101.
[6]	孔杰, 彭兆伟, 束煌, 王骥, 邝亦元, 钟天航, 丁桂聪. 基于CBCT的儿童上颌正中多生牙的新分类方法及临床应用[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(6): 579-585.
[7]	邓李妮, 陈传俊, 王祎, 项先旺. 颞下颌关节二水焦磷酸钙结晶沉积症1例报告及文献复习[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(5): 522-525.
[8]	冯婉晴, 李静洁, 刘锦星, 劳蔚. 儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征手术苏醒期疼痛危险因素分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(2): 175-179.
[9]	施金雅, 李静洁, 刘锦星, 仇琳. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患儿全麻术后拔管时间的影响因素分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(2): 180-185.
[10]	王桃仙, 程立军, 魏泽全, 潘祥峰, 赵民朝. 髁突形态与髁突矢状骨折发生率之间的关系分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(1): 59-63.
[11]	吕政展, 朱柏恺, 郑美里, 刘旌毅, 汪席均, 洪越扬, 江凌勇. 55例特发性髁突吸收患者临床特点与颅颌面结构特征分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(6): 541-547.
[12]	庞超远, 马东洋, 张文凯, 王兵武, 刘东. 54例学龄前儿童颌面部骨折临床分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(6): 586-589.
[13]	张大河, 沈佩, 杨驰. 青少年颞下颌关节盘前移位患者就诊情况分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(5): 437-442.
[14]	张大河, 沈佩, 杨驰. 青少年颞下颌关节盘前移位患者就诊情况分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(5): 443-448.
[15]	姚侃, 谢轶伦, 于雯雯, 魏思龙, 夏亮, 郑彤, 卢晓峰. 清醒及麻醉状态下5种口内扁桃体肥大评估方法可靠性比较[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(5): 461-465.