下颌体缺损腓骨重建小型钛板固定的生物力学分析

中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (2): 107-111.

下颌体缺损腓骨重建小型钛板固定的生物力学分析

殷学民, 刘雄, 扶晟, 张君伟, 徐国翔

南方医科大学南方医院口腔颌面外科,南方医科大学口腔医学院,广东广州 510515

收稿日期:2013-08-20 修回日期:2013-10-11 出版日期:2014-03-10 发布日期:2014-11-06
通讯作者: 殷学民,Tel:020-61642022,E-mail: yinxm@fimmu.com
作者简介:殷学民(1965-),男,博士,教授,硕士研究生导师
基金资助:
广东省科技计划项目(2012B0313800144); 南方医院新技术、新项目(201118)

Biomechanical analysis of mandibular body defect reconstruction with fibula fixed with miniplates

YIN Xue-min, LIU Xiong, FU Sheng, ZHANG Jun-wei, XU Guo-xiang

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University; College of Stomatology, Southern Medical University. Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China

Received:2013-08-20 Revised:2013-10-11 Online:2014-03-10 Published:2014-11-06
Supported by:
Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province (2012B0313800144); New Technology and New Project of Nanfang Hospital(201118)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：分析小型钛板固定下颌体缺损腓骨重建的应力分布特点及位移情况,为下颌体缺损腓骨重建的内固定提供生物力学参考。方法：建立下颌体缺损腓骨重建小型4孔钛板固定的有限元模型,模拟前牙与健侧磨牙垂直加载,分析钛板钛钉应力分布及腓骨前后端位移情况。结果：前牙加载时,相应钛板钛钉应力、腓骨前后端位移值均大于后牙加载时;前牙加载时腓骨前端最大位移值为264.44 μm,而后牙加载时为149.02 μm。钛板最大应力值出现在后上方钛板处;下颌骨残端钛钉最大应力值位于前上方靠近交界处的第1颗钛钉处,应力沿钉尖方向逐渐减小,在钉尖1/3处应力出现增大现象。结论：在下颌体缺损腓骨重建小钛板固定时,选择双皮质钛钉十分必要;在骨愈合前应避免前牙咬合,减少骨不愈合的风险。

关键词: 下颌骨缺损, 腓骨, 小钛板, 生物力学

Abstract: PURPOSE: To investigate the stress distribution characteristics and displacement of mandibular body defect reconstruction with fibula fixed with miniplates and to provide mechanical reference for clinical practice. METHODS: Finite element model of mandibular body defect reconstruction with fibula fixed with miniplates was established and contralateral molar and incisor vertical loading was simulated. Then stress of plates, screws and displacement of anterior and posterior ends of the fibula were analysed. RESULTS: Stress of corresponding miniplates, screws and displacement values of anterior and posterior fibula in incisor loading condition were larger than that of in molar loading condition. Maximum displacement value of anterior fibula in incisor loading condition was 264.22 microns, while 149.02 microns in molar loading conditions. Maximum stress values of all miniplates occurred in the posterior plate. Maximum stress of screws in the mandibular stumps occurred in the anterior superior screw near the mandible /fibula adjunction. Stress of screws began to decrease along the direction of nail tip, but stress in the one third tip of screw increased. CONCLUSIONS: It is very important to choose bicortical screw when mandibular body defect reconstruction with fibula in fixations. Biting on front teeth before bone healing to reduce the risk of nonunion should be avoided.

Key words: Mandibular defect, Fibula, Miniplates, Biomechanics

中图分类号:

R782.2

殷学民, 刘雄, 扶晟, 张君伟, 徐国翔. 下颌体缺损腓骨重建小型钛板固定的生物力学分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2014, 12(2): 107-111.

YIN Xue-min, LIU Xiong, FU Sheng, ZHANG Jun-wei, XU Guo-xiang. Biomechanical analysis of mandibular body defect reconstruction with fibula fixed with miniplates[J]. China J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2014, 12(2): 107-111.

参考文献

[1] Bell RB. A comparison of fixation techniques in oro-mandibular reconstruction utilizing fibular free flaps [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007, 65( Suppl 9): 39.e4.
[2] Robey AB, Spann ML, Mcauliff TM, et al. Comparison of miniplates and reconstruction plates in fibular flap reconstruction of the mandible [J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2008, 122(6): 1733-1738.
[3] Maurer P, Eckert AW, Kriwalsky MS, et al. Scope and limitations of methods of mandibular reconstruction:a long-term follow-up [J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010, 48(2): 100-104.
[4] Urken ML, Buchbinder D, Costantino PD, et al. Oromandibular reconstruction using microvascular composite flaps: report of 210 cases[J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1998, 124(1): 46-55.
[5] Nagasao T, Kobayashi M, Tsuchiya Y, et al. Finite element analysis of the stresses around endosseous implants in various reconstructed mandibular models[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2002, 30(3): 170-177.
[6] Savoldelli C, Bouchard PO, Loudad R, et al. Stress distribution in the temporo-mandibular joint discs during jaw closing: a high-resolution three-dimensional finite-element model analysis [J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 2012, 34(5): 405-413.
[7] Hart RT, Hennebel VV, Thongpreda N, et al. Modeling the biomechanics of the mandible: a three-dimensional finite element study [J]. J Biomech, 1992, 25(3): 261-286.
[8] 孙庚林, 周健, 郑孝慈, 等. 下颌骨骨折生物接骨内固定的三维有限元分析 [J]. 口腔颌面外科杂志, 2005, 15(1): 39-42.
[9] 王冬, 杨壮群, 虎小毅. 下颌骨体部缺损游离髂骨块移植不同连接方式的应力分析[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2007, 25(4): 345-348.
[10] Sugiura T, Horiuchi K, Sugimura M, et al. Evaluation of threshold stress for bone resorption around screws based on in vivo strain measurement of miniplate [J]. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact, 2000, 1(2): 165-170.
[11] 殷学民, 李燕, 张美超, 等. 下颌骨体部缺损钛板重建的生物力学分析 [J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2012, 10(1): 18-22.
[12] Nagasao T, Miyamoto J, Tamaki T, et al. A comparison of stresses in implantation for grafted and plate-and-screw mandible reconstruction [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2010, 109(3): 346-356.
[13] Kimura A, Nagasao T, Kaneko T, et al. Adaquate fixation of plates for stability during mandibular reconstruction [J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2006, 34(4): 193-200.
[14] 邹朝勇, 徐金, 姜平. 不同年龄下颌骨应力分布与骨折发病率的关系 [J]. 法医学杂志, 2007, 23(6): 434-437.
[15] Lovald ST, Khraishi T, Wagner J, et al. Comparison of plate-screw systems used in mandibular fracture reduction: finite element analysis [J]. J Biomech Eng, 2006, 128(5): 654-662.
[16] Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L, Lekholm U. Influence of mono- and bicortical anchorage on the integration of titanium implants. A study in the rabbit tibia[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,1996,25(3): 229-235.
[17] Arbag H, Korkmaz HH, Ozturk K, et al. Comparative evaluation of different miniplates for internal fixation of mandible fractures using finite element analysis[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2008,66(6): 1225-1232.