中国口腔颌面外科杂志

中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3): 222-225.doi: 10.19438/j.cjoms.2021.03.007

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

磨牙区使用角度螺丝一体冠不同全瓷材料修复种植单冠：1年前瞻性半口自身对照研究

杨路鹏1#, 樊林峰2#, 史俊宇3, 张枭3, 顾迎新3,*, 张楚南3,*   

  1. 1.淮安市口腔医院 种植中心,江苏 淮安 223300;
    2.上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院 放射科,上海 200011;
    3.上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院 口腔种植科,上海交通大学口腔医学院,国家口腔医学中心, 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,上海市口腔医学重点实验室,上海 200011
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-19 修回日期:2020-12-20 发布日期:2021-07-16
  • 通讯作者: 张楚南,E-mail: zcn1114@163.com;顾迎新,E-mail: yingxingu@163.com。*共同通信作者
  • 作者简介:杨路鹏（1984-）,男,学士,主治医师,E-mail: yang_zhi18@qq.com;樊林峰（1980-）,男,学士,主管技师,E-mail: 847472535@qq.com。#并列第一作者
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金（81771116）; 上海交通大学医学院第九人民医院生物样本库项目（YBKA201906）

Angulated screw channel restored with monolithic zirconia vs. porcelain-fused-to zirconia implant crowns: a prospective clinical trial in split-mouth design

YANG Lu-peng1, FAN Lin-feng2, SHI Jun-yu3, ZHANG Xiao3, GU Ying-xin3, ZHANG Chu-nan3   

  1. 1. Department of Implant Dentistry, Huai'an Stomatology Hospital. Huai'an 223300, Jiangsu Province;
    2. Department of Radiology, Shanghai Ninth Peoples' Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011;
    3. Department of Implant Dentistry, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011, China
  • Received:2020-11-19 Revised:2020-12-20 Published:2021-07-16

PDF (PC)

257

摘要： 目的 评价种植体支持的角度螺丝一体冠不同全瓷材料修复单冠在随访1年后的临床效果。方法 纳入13例上颌或下颌磨牙区双侧对称缺失的患者,每例患者接受两侧种植治疗。同一患者使用相同尺寸的2颗种植体。3~6个月后采用角度螺丝通道一体全瓷冠修复,每例患者的修复体分为全锆组和传统组。戴牙后即刻和12个月后进行X线检查,记录患者对修复体使用1年后的美学、功能评分及并发症。采用SAS 9.4软件对数据进行统计学分析。结果 13例患者修复后12个月的种植体成功率为100%。美学评价与功能评价在全锆组和传统组无显著差异（P>0.05）。全锆组边缘骨吸收为（-0.117±0.157）mm,传统组边缘骨吸收为（-0.141±0.153）mm,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 在本研究范围内,磨牙区使用2种全瓷修复方式的螺丝通道一体冠临床效果良好,全锆冠与传统全瓷冠修复效果无显著差异。

关键词: 角度螺丝通道一体冠, 牙种植体, 后牙, 修复, 氧化锆

Abstract: PURPOSE: The objective of the present study was to compare the clinical performance of angulated screw channel restored with monolithic zirconia and porcelain-fused-to-zirconia implant crowns. MOTHODS: In a prospective, clinical, split-mouth trial, bilateral premolar or molar single gaps in 13 patients were restored with angulated screw channel with either monolithic (experimental group) or porcelain-fused-to-zirconia (control group). Patient's subjective evaluation, technical complications and crestal bone level change were recorded during a follow-up period of 12 months. SAS 9.4 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: No implant was lost during the follow-up period. Of the crowns in esthetic appearance, there were 10 (excellent)/3(acceptable) in the experimental group and 12 (excellent)/1(acceptable) in the control group (P>0.05). Of the crowns in function, there were 12(excellent)/1(acceptable) in the experimental group and 11(excellent)/2(acceptable) in the control group (P>0.05). Changes in bone crest level seemed to have no correlation with either monolithic crowns or porcelain fused to zirconia crowns（P>0.05）. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of our study, over a 12-month follow-up, angulated screw channel restored with monolithic and porcelain-fused-to-zirconia implant crowns shows comparable clinical and radiological results.

Key words: Angulated screw channel, Dental implants, Posterior teeth, Restoration, Zirconia

中图分类号: