支架植入治疗颈动脉体瘤术后继发假性动脉瘤的临床分析

中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3): 253-257.

支架植入治疗颈动脉体瘤术后继发假性动脉瘤的临床分析

周斌, 庄秀妹, 陈伟良, 王友元, 张大明, 范松, 黄志权

中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院口腔颌面外科,广东广州 510120

收稿日期:2014-05-04 修回日期:2014-08-04 出版日期:2015-05-20 发布日期:2015-06-18
通讯作者: 陈伟良,Tel:020-81332429,E-mail:drchen@vip.163.com
作者简介:周斌（1988-）,男,博士研究生,E-mail:dophenchou@163.com

Interventional treatment with stent graft implantation of pseudoaneurysm following blunt dissection of carotid body tumors

ZHOU Bin, ZHUANG Xiu-mei, CHEN Wei-liang, WANG You-yuan, ZHANG Da-ming, FAN Song, HUANG Zhi-quan

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, SUN Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, SUN Yat-sen University. Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong Province, China

Received:2014-05-04 Revised:2014-08-04 Online:2015-05-20 Published:2015-06-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的评价手术治疗颈动脉体瘤和支架植入治疗切除术后继发假性动脉瘤的临床疗效。方法 6例颈动脉体瘤患者按Shamblin分级分别为I级1例、II级1例和III级4例,肿瘤大小为2 cm×3 cm~5 cm×6 cm（平均3.7 cm× 4.7 cm）。其中直接手术切除颈动脉体瘤2例,手术切除颈动脉体瘤并结扎颈外动脉2例,颈总动脉-颈内动脉人造血管重建2例。结果所有患者均未出现围术期死亡及卒中,出血量为250~650 mL（平均455 mL）。2例患者术后出现假性动脉瘤和声带麻痹,经介入引导下血管支架植入和药物治疗后症状完全消失。随诊6~17个月,未发现肿瘤复发及严重并发症。结论手术治疗颈动脉体瘤效果良好、安全可靠;直接手术切除可能继发假性动脉瘤,而介入引导下血管支架植入具有良好的治疗效果。

关键词: 颈动脉体瘤, 颈动脉重建, Shamblin分类, 假性动脉瘤

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical effect of surgical treatment of carotid body tumor and interventional treatment with stent graft implantation of pseudoaneurysms following blunt dissection of the tumor treated. METHODS: Six cases were classified as Shamblin I, II and III in 1, 1, and 4 cases, respectively. The tumor sizes varied from a minimum of 2 cm×3 cm to a maximum of 5 cm× 6 cm (median: 3.7 cm×4.7 cm). Two of them underwent blunt dissection of carotid body tumor, two underwent blunt dissection and ligation of external carotid artery of carotid body tumor and 2 had common carotid artery-internal carotid artery artificial vascular reconstruction. RESULTS: No perioperative mortality and stroke occurred. The range of mean blood loss was 455 mL (range, 250-650 mL). Two patients had pseudoaneurysm or vocal cord paralysis postoperatively and both recovered with stent graft implantation and medical treatment respectively. The patients were followed up for 6-17 months, no recurrence was seen at the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of carotid body tumor is acceptably safe and effective according Shamblin classification; Pseudoaneurysms following blunt dissection of the tumor can occur and using a stent graft was feasible for treating the lesion.

Key words: Carotid body tumor, Carotid artery reconstruction, Shamblin classification, Pseudoaneurysm

中图分类号:

R782.05

周斌, 庄秀妹, 陈伟良, 王友元, 张大明, 范松, 黄志权. 支架植入治疗颈动脉体瘤术后继发假性动脉瘤的临床分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2015, 13(3): 253-257.

ZHOU Bin, ZHUANG Xiu-mei, CHEN Wei-liang, WANG You-yuan, ZHANG Da-ming, FAN Song, HUANG Zhi-quan. Interventional treatment with stent graft implantation of pseudoaneurysm following blunt dissection of carotid body tumors[J]. China J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2015, 13(3): 253-257.

参考文献

[1] Rao AB, Koeller KK, Adair CF. From the archives of the AFIP. Paragangliomas of the head and neck: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology [J]. Radiographics, 1999, 19(6): 1605-1632.
[2] Rodriguez-Cuevas S, L&#x0dbc0;&#x0dda9;pez-Garza J, Labastida-Almendaro S. Carotid body tumors in inhabitants of altitudes higher than 2000 meters above sea level [J]. Head Neck, 1998, 20(5): 374-378.
[3] Shamblin WR, ReMine WH, Sheps SG, et al. Carotid body tumor (chemodectoma). Clinicopathologic analysis of ninety cases [J]. Am J Surg, 1971, 122(6): 732-739.
[4] Erdogan BA, Bora F, Altin G, et al. Our experience with carotid body paragangliomas [J]. Prague Med Rep, 2012, 113(4): 262-270.
[5] Hirsch JH, Killien FC,Troupin RH. Bilateral carotid body tumors and cyanotic heart disease [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1980, 134(5): 1073-1075.
[6] Keating JF, Miller GA,Keaveny TV. Carotid body tumours: report of six cases and a review of management [J]. J R Coll Surg Edinb, 1990, 35(3): 172-174.
[7] Persky MS, Setton A, Niimi Y, et al. Combined endovascular and surgical treatment of head and neck paragangliomas a team approach [J]. Head Neck, 2002, 24(5): 423-431.
[8] Sanli A, Oz K, Ayduran E, et al. Carotid body tumors and our surgical approaches [J]. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2012, 64(2): 158-161.
[9] Arya S, Rao V, Juvekar S, et al. Carotid body tumors: objective criteria to predict the Shamblin group on MR imaging [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2008, 29(7): 1349-1354.
[10] Karaman E, Isildak H, Yilmaz M, et al. Management of paragangliomas in otolaryngology practice: review of a 7-year experience [J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2009, 20(4): 1294-1297.
[11] Ramesh A, Muthukumarassamy R, Karthikeyan VS, et al. Pseudoaneurysm of internal carotid artery after carotid body tumor excision[J]. Indian J Radiol Imaging, 2013, 23(3): 208-211.
[12] Troutman DA, Mohan CR, Samhouri FA, et al. Endovascular repair of carotid artery pseudoaneurysm after carotid endarterectomy with self-expanding covered stents-a long-term follow-up [J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2010, 24(7): 954. e13-16.
[13] Dahya V,Chalasani P. Successful obliteration of a pseudoaneurysm from Post-CEA repair secondary to a pruitt-Inahara shunt using a stent graft [J]. Case Rep Vasc Med, 2013, 2013: 382485.
[14] Ellis PK, Kennedy PT, Barros D'Sa AA. Successful exclusion of a high internal carotid pseudoaneurysm using the Wallgraft endoprosthesis [J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,2002,25(1):68-69.
[15] Power AH, Bower TC, Kasperbauer J, et al. Impact of preoperative embolization on outcomes of carotid body tumor resections [J]. J Vasc Surg, 2012, 56(4): 979-989.
[16] Luna-Ortiz K, Villavicencio-Valencia V, Carmona-Luna T, et al. Carotid body tumour resection with LigaSure device [J]. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp, 2010, 61(1): 6-11.