中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (6): 567-572.doi: 10.19438/j.cjoms.2025.06.005

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

电动开口器对颞下颌关节盘复位术后张口训练的效果评价

王鹏程1, 顾祝明2, 何冬梅3   

  1. 1.浙江大学医学院附属金华医院 口腔科,浙江 金华 321017;
    2.上海瑞吉思医疗器械有限公司,上海 200433;
    3.上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院 口腔外科,上海 200011
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-19 修回日期:2025-07-29 出版日期:2025-11-20 发布日期:2025-12-04
  • 通讯作者: 何冬梅,E-mail: lucyhe119@163.com
  • 作者简介:王鹏程(1992-),男,硕士研究生,E-mail: wpcjhzxyy@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心课题项目(2022ZZ01017); 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院原创探索项目(JYYC015)

Evaluation of the electric mouth opener on mouth-opening training effectiveness following temporomandibular joint disc repositioning surgery

Wang Pengcheng1, Gu Zhuming2, He Dongmei3   

  1. 1. Department of Stomatology, Jinhua Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Jinhua 321017, Zhejiang Province;
    2. Shanghai RIGS Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. Shanghai 200433;
    3. Department of Oral Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Shanghai 200011, China
  • Received:2025-06-19 Revised:2025-07-29 Online:2025-11-20 Published:2025-12-04

摘要: 目的:介绍自主研发的电动开口器,并评价其在颞下颌关节盘复位手术后张口训练中的效果。方法:纳入颞下颌关节盘复位术后开口度<30 mm的30例患者,根据训练方式随机分为徒手牵伸组、牵伸支具组和电动开口器训练组。3组均进行6周居家康复训练,徒手牵拉组以手指辅助牵拉,牵伸支具组采用传统颞下颌关节牵伸支具,电动开口器组采用自主研发的4档可调节电动开口器。评估患者训练前、训练后2周及6周的最大开口度、疼痛和下颌运动评分。结果:三组患者训练前最大开口度无显著差异。张口训练6周后,三组最大开口度较训练前均显著改善(P<0.05),其中电动开口器组[(39.2±1.5)mm]显著高于牵伸支具组[(35.7±2.8)mm]及徒手牵伸组[(32.1±4.0)mm]。电动开口器组训练后2周时疼痛评分出现显著降低,较徒手牵伸组有统计学差异(P<0.05)。术后6周,器械辅助张口训练的两组患者下颌运动功能评分均优于徒手牵伸组,电动开口器组效果更显著(P<0.05)。结论:电动开口器训练安全可靠,能显著加速颞下颌关节盘复位术后患者开口度的恢复,具有操作简便、安全稳定的优点。

关键词: 颞下颌关节盘复位术, 电动开口器, 张口训练, 最大开口度

Abstract: PURPOSE: To introduce a self-developed electric mouth opener and evaluate its efficacy in postoperative mouth-opening exercise following temporomandibular joint disc repositioning surgery. METHODS: Thirty patients with maximal interincisal opening(MIO) <30 mm after open disc repositioning surgery for anterior disc displacement were randomly assigned to three training groups: manual stretching, stretching device group, and electric mouth opener. All groups underwent 6 weeks of home-based rehabilitation: the manual group performed finger-assisted stretching, the stretching device group used a traditional TMJ stretching brace, and the electric group used the self-developed four-speed adjustable electric mouth opener. MIO, pain degree, and mandibular function evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS) before training, at 2 weeks and 6 weeks after training were recorded and compared. RESULTS: No significant differences in preoperative or postoperative MIO existed among three groups. After 6 weeks of training, all groups showed significant MIO improvement versus baseline (P<0.05). The electric mouth opener group achieved optimal recovery [(39.2±1.5) mm], significantly exceeding both the stretching device group [(35.7±2.8) mm] and manual group [(32.1±4.0) mm]. Pain reduction was most pronounced in the electric group. At 6 weeks, both device-assisted groups showed higher mandibular function scores than the manual group, with the electric mouth opener group showing superior efficacy(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The electric mouth opener is safe and effective for accelerating postoperative MIO recovery in TMJ disc repositioning patients, offering advantages in operational simplicity and stability.

Key words: Temporomandibular joint disc repositioning surgery, Electric mouth opener, Mouth-opening exercise, Maximal interincisal opening

中图分类号: