中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5): 463-467.doi: 10.19438/j.cjoms.2024.05.009

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

2种方法治疗下颌第二磨牙远中牙槽骨吸收的效果比较

祁庆龙, 余红梅, 潘洋   

  1. 无锡市新吴区新瑞医院(上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院无锡分院) 口腔科,江苏 无锡 214115
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-17 修回日期:2023-12-26 出版日期:2024-09-20 发布日期:2024-09-29
  • 通讯作者: 祁庆龙,E-mail: qijing0402@163.com
  • 作者简介:祁庆龙(1985-),男,本科,主治医师

Comparison of 2 treatment methods for distal alveolar bone resorption of mandibular second molars

QI Qing-long, YU Hong-mei, PAN Yang   

  1. Department of Stomatology, Wuxi Xinwu District Xinrui HospitalRuijin Hospital Wuxi Branch, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Wuxi 214115, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2023-11-17 Revised:2023-12-26 Online:2024-09-20 Published:2024-09-29

摘要: 目的: 比较光动力疗法(photodynamic therapy,PDT)联合牙周基础治疗与单纯牙周基础治疗在下颌第二磨牙远中牙槽骨吸收中的临床效果。方法: 选择下颌第三磨牙近中阻生且第二磨牙远中牙槽骨存在吸收的患者57例,共计82颗下颌第二磨牙,随机分为2组,实验组在拔除第三磨牙后对第二磨牙远中根远中面进行PDT联合常规牙周基础治疗,对照组仅进行常规牙周基础治疗。术后追踪观察1年,比较2组患者第二磨牙松动度、牙周探诊深度(probing depth,PD)、临床附着水平(clinical attachment loss,CAL)、远中牙槽骨缺损深度(osseous defect depth,ODD)等指标。采用SPSS 25.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果: 2组患者第二磨牙松动度在术后1周、3个月、6个月及12个月的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);实验组PD、CAL术后3个月、6个月较对照组显著改善(P<0.05),而术后1周、12个月2组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后12个月,2组ODD差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论: 下颌第三磨牙近中阻生,第二磨牙远中牙槽骨有吸收时,在短期内(<6个月),拔除第三磨牙后同期对第二磨牙远中根远中面进行PDT联合牙周基础治疗较单纯牙周治疗效果更好。

关键词: 牙周常规治疗, 光动力疗法, 下颌第二磨牙, 牙槽骨吸收

Abstract: PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of photodynamic therapy(PDT) combined with scaling and root planing and only scaling and root planing in the management of distal alveolar bone resorption of mandibular second molars. METHODS: A total of 82 mandibular second molars in 57 patients whose mandibular third molars were mesially impacted and distal alveolar bone were resorbed were randomly divided into experimental group and control group. In the experimental group, the distal surface of the distal root of the mandibular second molar received scaling and root planing combined with PDT after mandibular third molar was extracted, while the control group only received scaling and root planing. The observation lasted for 1 year, the tooth mobility, probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL) and the osseous defect depth(ODD) were examined and recorded. The data were compared and analyzed using SPSS 25.0 software package. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in tooth mobility of mandibular second molar between the two groups at 1 week, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery (P>0.05). PD and CAL in the experimental group were significantly improved at 3 months, 6 months(P<0.05), while the clinical outcome changes at 1 week and 12 months after surgery between the 2 groups were not significant(P>0.05). There was no significant difference in ODD between the two groups 12 months after surgery(P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the short term (< 6 months), PDT combined with scaling and root planing on the distal surface of the mandibular second molar distal root is more effective than scaling and root planing alone, when the mandibular third molar is mesially impacted and the distal alveolar bone of mandibular second molar is resorbed.

Key words: Scaling and root planing, Photodynamic therapy, Mandibular second molar, Alveolar resorption

中图分类号: