中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (1): 44-47.doi: 10.19438/j.cjoms.2019.01.008

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

西藏日喀则地区口腔颌面间隙感染90例临床分析

王欢1, 格桑1, 吴小燕1, 次旦扎西1,*, 乌丹旦2,*   

  1. 1.日喀则市人民医院 口腔科,西藏 日喀则 857000;
    2.上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院·口腔医学院 口腔颅颌面科,国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心, 上海市口腔医学重点实验室,上海市口腔医学研究所,上海 200011;
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-25 修回日期:2018-11-30 出版日期:2019-01-20 发布日期:2019-02-21
  • 通讯作者: 乌丹旦,E-mail:179554314@qq.com;次旦扎西,E-mail:304864501@qq.com。*共同通信作者
  • 作者简介:王欢(1982-),女,本科,主治医师,E-mail:419524655@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发项目(2016YFC1000502); 上海交通大学医工交叉项目(YG2016QN11)

Clinical analysis of 90 cases with oral and maxillofacial space infection in Shigatse, Tibet

WANG Huan1, GE Sang1, WU Xiao-yan1, CI Dan Zha-xi1, WU Dan-dan2   

  1. 1.Department of Stomatology, Shigatse People's Hospital. Shigatse 857000, Tibet;
    2.Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011, China;
  • Received:2018-09-25 Revised:2018-11-30 Online:2019-01-20 Published:2019-02-21

摘要: 目的 探讨西藏日喀则地区口腔颌面间隙感染患者的发病特点。方法 回顾2015年1月—2018年2月在日喀则市人民医院口腔科住院的90例颌面间隙感染患者的病例资料,分析发病年龄、职业、感染原因、好发部位等。结果 90例患者中,儿童、学生及农牧民为好发人群;牙源性感染为首要致病原因,以第一、二恒磨牙为主要病灶牙;单间隙感染71例,占78.89%;多间隙感染19例,占21.11%;下颌下间隙受累最多。结论 日喀则地区口腔颌面间隙感染发病年龄较早,应及早对儿童及父母开展口腔卫生宣教,提高医疗保健意识,并加强基层医疗队伍建设。

关键词: 口腔颌面间隙感染, 临床特点, 西藏

Abstract: PURPOSE: To investigate the incidence and characteristics of oral and maxillofacial infection in patients in Shigatse, Tibet. METHODS: The data of 90 patients with oral and maxillofacial infection who were hospitalized in the Department of Stomatology of Shigatse People's Hospital from January 2015 to February 2018 were reviewed. The age of onset, occupation, pathogen, and predilection sites were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 90 patients, children, students and farmers accounted the most; odontogenic infection was the primary cause of infection, with the first and second permanent molars as the main foci. Seventy-one patients had single space infection, accounting for 78.89%; while 19 patients had multiple space infections, accounting for 21.11%; the submandibular space was involved most commonly. CONCLUSIONS: The age of onset of oral and maxillofacial space infection in Shigatse is younger. It is necessary to enhance oral health education for children and parents, improve medical and health awareness, and strengthen construction of primary medical teams.

Key words: Oral and maxillofacial space infection, Clinical characteristics, Tibet

中图分类号: